English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.911revisited.com/video.html

2006-08-09 05:18:53 · 5 answers · asked by cory55355 2 in Politics & Government Civic Participation

The real reason for this question was not to start debate , but for an excuse to post that link..People are so close minded and judgemental , its sad. And if you dont know , maybe you should watch and find out, its simple physics and common sense.

2006-08-09 06:57:19 · update #1

5 answers

Yes there where explosives. There are recordings of the firefighters radio communications reporting explosions at several different places in the building. Jet Fuel can not burn at the tempatures needed to cause molten metal.
Why do you think the media stopped showing the footage of the towers. The government did not want the footage looked at too carefully. If you did you would see evidence that did not add up to the official story. Wake up America.

2006-08-09 12:44:43 · answer #1 · answered by BlueNTexas 2 · 0 2

Yes explosives were used...in the form of thousands of gallons of jet fuel propelled into the buildings at a high rate of speed via 747 missles.

2006-08-09 13:51:50 · answer #2 · answered by kelly24592 5 · 1 0

I dont think there were, i keep seeing videos that state you can hear explosions, but people hear voices too, it doesnt mean they are really there. I cant hear the explosions in any of the videos that I have seen

2006-08-09 12:26:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There were no explosives used, the jets were completely fueled so they acted like bombs in themselves.

2006-08-09 13:21:29 · answer #4 · answered by chriswtj 2 · 0 0

i don't think explosives were used i think it was just the plains that rewined the twin towers.

2006-08-09 12:28:17 · answer #5 · answered by Becca 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers