Is there anyone out there who can prove that Evolution teachings are a lie without to use the bible?

Question

The reason for asking this question is to confirm if this scripture is TRUE or FALSE:

Psa 14:1

"THE FOOL SAYS IN HIS HEART, "THERE IS NO GOD" .They are corrupt (e.g. rude, sacarstic,throw innuendos, insult, swear etc ), they do abominable deeds, there is none who does good."

If we came to Y!Answers for the truth, then let no one be offended.

Cheers!

Answer 1

Scientific evidence casts serious doubts on the theory of evolution, for example:

* Biological Evidence
Evolution - Fact or Faith?
http://www.case-creation.org.uk/biolo1.html

* The Fossil Record (Updated 3 July, 2005)
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/fossil.htm

* Living "Fossils"
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/living.htm

* The Cambrian Explosion
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/explosion.htm

* New T.Rex Discoveries (Updated 10 June, 2005)
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/t-rex.htm

* "Missing Links"
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/misslinks.htm

* Anthropic Principle
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/anthropic.htm

* Irreducible complexity
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/irreducible.htm

* Biological Evidence
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/biology.htm

* The Moon
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/moon.htm

* Earth's Fight Against Solar Attacks
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/earthfight.htm

* Scientific arguments against evolution:
Science itself refutes Darwinism
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/arguments.shtml

* The Origins of Darwinism
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/origins.shtml

* Darwinism is Racist
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/racist.shtml

* Evidence for Intelligent Design
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/intelligent-design.shtml

* Creation Science
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/creationscience.shtml

* Evidence For A Young Earth and Universe
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/youngearth.shtml

* Age of man:
The Race of Man Is Younger Than Previously Thought
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/ageofman.shtml

* Darwinism Is Strongly Rooted But Is Being Challenged
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/summary.shtml

* How the theory of evolution breaks down in the light of modern science
http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/index.html

* Famous Atheist Now Believes in God
http://www.sciencefindsgod.com/famous-atheist-now-believes-in-god.htm

* New Scientific Evidence for the Existence of God
http://www.cosmicfingerprints.com/audio/newevidence.htm

* References
http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/references.shtml

* Do real scientists believe in Creation?
Partial list of Creation Scientists
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-scientists.html

* If you can read this, I can prove God exists
http://www.cosmicfingerprints.com/ifyoucanreadthis.htm

*The Case for Intelligent Evolution
http://www.cosmicfingerprints.com/intelligent_evolution.pdf

* http://www.drdino.com/

Answer 2

there have been many attempts by the scientists involved in the field to try and prove it wrong. They do this by using the theory to make a prediction that goes against everything else they know. Then they make a prediction based on the other theory Then they figure out a way to check these predictions. Finally they check to see which which prediction is right. The Idea of scientific truth involves this testing, the ability to make useful predictions, and the elegance factor, which is how much the new theory is simpler to use, and the completeness, which if the theory matches with all the known facts and observations of the real world.
If the theory fails to make accurate predictions that would normally be fatal to the theory, if it matches everything the previous theory does but is more awkward it is usually rejected, If the theory is incomplete and does not match the real world observances then it is rejected as a false theory.
So far evolution theory has passed every test, nobody has been able to find a fatal flaw and it has proved very useful, both as a source of predictions about the real world and as a tool for many other branches of science. It is in accordance with all the known facts of how the world actually is, and is much simpler than any other postulates that have been presented.
Are you interested in a challenge. If you can come up with a better theory, something that works better, or is more complete, I am sure there are many research groups that would like to hear from you. If any of your responders can create a prediction of the theory which is false the theory would fail and be rejected.

Answer 3

There is no data to support the belief (note the word belief, as in faith) that living organisms, on their own, come into being from non-living matter, or that, on their own, they become more complex than they already are. These things have never been observed, and there is no proof that it has happened in the past. The laws which govern such things are also against it (thermodynamics, biogenesis, etc).

A study of the teachings of evolution both currently and in the past will show time and again that the data has been forged or otherwise distorted to support evolution. Notice how many times evolutionists change their story.

If you have a theory, and you test the theory, and it fails the test, you ought to toss the theory. Evolutionists refuse to toss the theory, even though it has failed so many tests, and as new information becomes available due to new discoveries or new technology, they keep having to change the theory to make it fit the latest info.

Thousands of degreed professional scientists, people who were never 'religious' per se, are rejecting evolution every year based upon the data they gather in their work. These people are immediately branded as 'pseudo-scientists' or non-scientists altogether by the evolutionist scientists (currently still a majority, but not for much longer) for not holding fast to the religion of evolution.

On the other hand, other scientists who doubt the traditional evolution ideals are still considered 'legitimate' by these same evolutionists as long as they proclaim 'hopeful monsters', ufo's or aliens or any other nonsense as long as it doesn't involve a God, for these people have religiously held to the idea that there is no God, and all conclusions must support that or they are scoffed.

Consider this: All the cumulative knowledge of all scientists living and dead equates to far less than 1% of the universe having been studied, yet, these people have stated in absolute terms that there is no God. This is the equivalent of studying one square inch of soil in New Jersey, and upon finding no trace of gold in the sample, unequivocally stating that not only is there no gold in all of New Jersey, but that gold does not exist at all. That would be a foolish statement, and only a fool could go along with it.

Answer 4

I have never seen one bit of evidence that proved the joke evolution. Bones, Ive got em. Old bones in rock, old bones in rocks. Funky monkey bones, Funky monkey bones. Better show me something metamorphosing, besides what was created to do so.

Answer 5

Evolution is a lie we werent created by monkeys we were created by the one and only the almighty God himself created us.

Answer 6

No one can disprove evolution. They can hide from it and nit pick and make acrobatic leaps in logic... but they can't disprove it because there is simply too much evidence that supports it.

Here's a great video for you... it addresses that very verse.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdVucvo-kDU

Answer 7

Hope,
Don't wast your time these people don't even know what evolution is. They just go by what their preacher says.

Answer 8

Yes, science itself.

Answer 9

Yes , that scripture is true! And do yourself a favor and read ALL THE SCRIPTURE because I have, and tested them, and they are FLAWLESS!!!!!!

Answer 10

you can't prove that evolution is false, becase there is an overwhealming amount of scientific evidence that supports it.