I hope u guys dont get bored??...when I wuz in the AirForce..I had this gud friend.. her name wuz Karen...we flew together on EC 135....she wuz 2lt and I wuz 1lt....what we did wuz... fly the DEW line and listen for anything going on.. that what we did everyday....and when we were up there...Mig 29's used to gome great us.. and fly our wing...well ya know how that is... we used to poke fun at one another... but one time..we abt 35 thousand.. and this 29 comes up...Karen looks over at me .. and sez Jim..I gonna give em hell..I sed , Karen.. we cant talk . that the ling boys job.... she sed oh,I aint gonna talk...she stands up in the port side glass... an unzipped her flight suit and pulls her bra down and leans right in the window...and here is this mig pilot right off our wing.. well we were so close that this guy pulls out and comes back....stays right with us for awhile...Karen sits back down ,and sez..i guess he comin back for more!!.. I have never laughed so hard in my life!!!!!!
2006-08-08 15:55:59 · 10 answers · asked by Doug B 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
There was a Darwin award for this kind of behavior. According to darwinawards.com:
The private pilot and a pilot rated passenger [two pilots] were going to practice simulated instrument flight. Witnesses observed the airplane's right wing fail in a dive and crash. Examination of the wreckage and bodies revealed that both occupants were partially clothed and the front right seat was in the full aft reclining position. [The pilots had converted the co-pilot seat to a bed.] Neither body showed evidence of seatbelts or shoulder harnesses being worn. [They were lying on the bed.] Examination of the individuals' clothing revealed no evidence of ripping or distress to the zippers and belts. [Their lack of clothing seemed to be voluntary.]
The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows:
The pilot in command's improper in-flight decision to divert her attention to other activities not related to the conduct of the flight. [The pilot and co-pilot were having sex, and nobody was flying the plane.] Contributing to the accident was the exceeding of the design limits of the airplane leading to a wing failure. [The lack of a pilot caused the plane to fly erratically, over-stressing the wing and leading to a crash.]
2006-08-08 16:17:24 · answer #1 · answered by bowlingcap 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A 1st LT in the Air Force has at least a B.A. in some technical career field if they are flying in an Aircraft. This looks like it was written by someone who didnt graduate high school.
Also, all C-130s are prop engine aircraft, while a MiG29 is a supersonic fighter jet, so this is highly unlikely.
2006-08-08 16:13:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I assume you were in the Russian Air farce since you definitely would never be a 1st Lt in our Air Force, even under the sparsest conditions..
The only thing true about this posting is that it was posted.
2006-08-08 17:09:21 · answer #3 · answered by Mr. Been there 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ha!! If you think that was something, listen to this. I was on an airplane flight to Hawaii and went out on the wing and took a piss while upside down!!!!!!
2006-08-08 16:21:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even with the correct spelling the story is BS.
2006-08-08 16:17:06 · answer #5 · answered by dfuerstcat 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
False there no room in a mig to stand up and disrobe....
2006-08-08 16:01:28 · answer #6 · answered by ole_lady_93 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sry it was to long but I liked it until i stopped reading but i read the last paragraph and i laugh but by the spelling in it i bet it not true or u dont know how to spell !!!
2006-08-08 16:01:23 · answer #7 · answered by I...love...me! 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wow if true that was guts!!! and a great story
2006-08-08 16:01:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
JUDGING BY THE SPELLING, I'D SAY IT'S FALSE.
2006-08-08 15:59:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
LIAR
2006-08-08 16:11:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋