He put electrodes on the genitalia of all the animals and left an abundance of hay and grass for them to eat. If any of them tried to eat another animal, he would shock ALL of them at the same time, thus making sure that the other animals would snitch.
2006-08-08 11:53:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
What does your dog do during a rainstorm?
He snoozes . . . right?
I suspect the animals on the Ark did alot of sleeping, and ate very little.
Besides, animals may not have eaten other animals until after the flood. In Gen 1:30 the Bible explains that all animals ate vegetation: "And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so." KJV
After the flood is the first mention of eating the flesh of aminals:
God told Noah in Gen 9:3 "Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things." KJV
So the answer to your question is: He didn't have to.
2006-08-08 11:44:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Noah sprinkled God's magic ambivalence dust on all the animals and snorted some too. So for forty days they were all too wired to eat. It was like a floating studio 54 only the animals were less freaky in Naohs day.
Noah drank and snorted God's ambivalence dust all the time.( How do you think he caught 1.5 million species of insects........in pairs)
Most of the animals would be so inbreed that they could get parts in the movie, Deliverance.
Let's really dick with everyone and talk about fresh and salt water mixing. Osmosis. Oh, who needs rational thought.
2006-08-08 11:52:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There were 2 of every unclean creature and 7 of every clean. In the time they were on the ark some would have had babies and then there would be food for meat eating animals. They were not on the ark for years so even if they had no food at all, not many would have starved to death.
2006-08-08 11:46:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by impossble_dream 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since God told Noah he could eat the animals after the flood (before that they were vegetarians), the theory is that the animals also were vegetarians before the flood and that eating meat may have been a way of controlling the animal population.
I have no problem believing that God could have closed the mouths of the animals if he wanted to, just as he did the lions who didn't get to eat Daniel.
2006-08-08 11:56:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by happygirl 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
XD LOL! I love woodworm! The best of all the random creatures on the ark! Too great: "That's structural!" LOL!!! Can't you just see Noah getting all upset about it? lol Being so worried... "Ohh crap, what will God think of all this? He'll be so angry with me! STOP IT, WOODWORM!!!"
2006-08-08 11:45:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since God prepared Noah for a flood, and you must remember that it never rained at that time so Noah was REALLY relying on his faith in God,by telling how to make the Ark and to fill it with his family and 2 each of all of the animals, don't you think He also prepared them to take provisions?
2006-08-08 11:48:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
LOL @ the woodworm!
That WAS funny.
:)
To the xtians that rely on the mistaken belief that all animals were vegetarian before the flood...explain fossilized meat that have been found in some dinosaur remains to me, would you? What's that? You can't? Oh dear...
2006-08-08 11:44:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by googlywotsit 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
yeah, woodworms were vegetarians like all the other animals, wait....that still wouldn't save the Ark.
2006-08-08 11:53:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by 自由思想家 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Scripture says that God quieted the animals. The great cats drank milk and so on. So it wasn't Noah, but God doing the stopping.
2006-08-08 11:46:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋