2006-08-08 08:54:05 · 6 answers · asked by islandgirl046 1 in Health ➔ Diet & Fitness
Not always exactly the same since on the outside there are things that can influence your walk. Like elevation, traffic, heat, and stuff like that. In a room (or treadmill) the calories burned are almost at a constant rate. But on avarage they will be within range of the other.
2006-08-08 08:58:30 · answer #1 · answered by Prince O Zamunda 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. The difference is when you're on a track, you're having to move your body forward as well as move across small bumps in the surface. The rougher the surface is, the more calories you will burn. Walking in place neither moves you forward, nor over obstacles.
2006-08-08 15:58:01 · answer #2 · answered by gilgamesh 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In place? Do you mean on a treadmill, or literally walking in place?
I assume you mean literally walking in place, and that would be the track burns more calories.
2006-08-08 15:58:26 · answer #3 · answered by miketorse 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree, walking on hills outside burns more calories that walking straight on a treadmill.
2006-08-08 16:00:31 · answer #4 · answered by Hot Pants 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. You need the stimulus of walking outdoors and you need the thrust of your body moving forward.
2006-08-08 16:06:22 · answer #5 · answered by Samba Queen 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hell naw.
2006-08-08 15:57:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋