2000 Mustang. Pontiac's really aren't all they are cracked up to be my sister has one only hers is a 2001 Grand Prix but alot of things have went wrong it. I have a 2004 Mustang & I absolutely love it, only minor problems which would be normal for any car. Hope I helped you.
2006-08-08 13:53:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by GT500girl 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mustang
2006-08-08 15:25:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by shadysoldier89 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mustangs=guys
grand ams=cheap boys
2006-08-08 15:27:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A Mustang of course they are sweet looking a grand am is boring (just my opinion)
2006-08-08 16:29:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jessica 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
both have bad transmissions but i'd go with the mustang only becuz when it breaks...which it will....u have more options to fix it and more places than the grand am, plus the mustang has a bit more power.
2006-08-08 16:30:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Grand Am fo sho Mustangs are peace of S***
2006-08-08 15:24:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Slim 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
the mustang is the better of the two. the mustang is the car of choice for street stock racers. grand am is trouble prone and failed its head on crash tests. hopefully they will dispose of this disgrace to the pontiac name.
2006-08-08 15:28:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by brian L 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mustang for sure, the pontaics are not as reliable as fords.
2006-08-09 13:32:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ladiez_Man 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
both have different things why they are good. but one thing that they have in common is that most of them don't last more then 130,000 or so miles. overall I like the grand am better
2006-08-08 16:23:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by serb423 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mustang! What the **** were you thinking!?
2006-08-08 23:01:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by 1970boss302mustang 2
·
0⤊
0⤋