Well......both, fact & Moral. The New test was written shortly after the death of Jesus. Yes you are correct about some in a Church the suppressed people...but that wasn't God or Jesus...that was people. People do all types of evil in the name of God and Jesus...but that doesn't make Jesus or God wrong.
I remember asking some of those same questions...you are using your brain and I'm glad to see that! Good Job!
2006-08-08 08:08:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
The bible was not written 1000 yrs after the fact, i'd like to know where you go tthat statistic. Although I disagree with the way the organized church handled the bible, as i disagree with the way they handle a lot of issues, I still believe the bible is written as fact. Not because the church says so, but because, first of all because I have seen the God of the bible work and do amazing miracles on the misisons field around the world. Secondly because it can be scientifically proven through theories such as the creation theory, which supports a literal 7 day creation of the earth, as well as a flood that scultpted the earth to be much like it is today, which supports what the bibile says.
2006-08-08 08:07:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Chris K 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe that as much of it is fact as wasn't changed by men in the early church. It is not my fault for believing something that was changed by someone else and passed off as truth, and those men will have to answer for their sins.
It is impossible to speculate about which parts are original and which parts have been changed, so take it or leave it. I'm tired of all the "cafeteria Christians" out there who only pick and choose bits of pieces to believe in, and say the rest isn't important without having any kind of reason for backing up their beliefs.
2006-08-08 08:05:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by sethle99 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Bible's primary purpose would be moral teachings. Its secondary purpose would be the recording of events and history - as they were understood at the time and according to the biased viewpoints of their authors. Sometimes this happily resulted in fact, and a lot of the time it didn't. Such is life.
2006-08-08 08:07:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Caritas 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your element is valid, yet purely because you mentioned that shall we no longer use the reality that God is announcing it in our answer. With this in suggestions, i might prefer to particularly ruin your rule; inspite of the undeniable fact that, i'm going to circulate far deeper than in basic terms announcing that God says to maintain on with the Bible. the type between the Bible and any random philosophy e book is hassle-free: in philosophy, you're informed that it extremely is morally stunning to stay a outstanding life, and that's the top of it. very few human beings are deterred from intercourse outdoors of marriage, drunkenness, abortion, homosexuality, or various different themes that are primary by applying many atheists yet are grotesque to Christians. With the Bible; inspite of the undeniable fact that, there's a objective, a clarification for the regulations. that is not in basic terms a tenet, it extremely is a command from the optimal being interior the universe. the type between the Bible and, say, the Koran; inspite of the undeniable fact that's that with different faith the followers are informed that in the event that they stay their lives in provider and relentless pursuit of their God or bigger skill then they might sooner or later have the means to attain the top of their faith (their "heaven" or "paradise"). With Christianity; inspite of the undeniable fact that, Jesus Christ himself got here down from heaven and took on the lowly sort of guy, walked between us, substitute into crucified, and then rose back so as that his followers might now no longer be compelled to have a much off and boring, non secular adventure. extremely, genuine Christianity isn't approximately boring faith on Sunday mornings, yet is a few consistent, flowing relationship with a real God. that isn't some problematic and ornate call to repent, that's me announcing that each and everybody religions in accordance with no longer something greater suitable than recited prayers and weekly repentance are surely lifeless, alongside with Christianity. With a real relationship with Jesus Christ; inspite of the undeniable fact that, it is going to become plenty greater suitable than that.
2016-11-04 03:38:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
A moral teaching book that endorses slavery, genocide, violence, and intolerance?????
Sorry, but as a moral teaching book, the bible fails miserably
2006-08-08 08:05:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋