bombs Middle East Afghanistan
2006-08-08 07:41:13 · 9 answers · asked by tobarisch 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I think it remains to be seen... probably the greatest impact was the dropping of the a-bomb on Japan. The environmental impact was quite significant, but it seems the human impact (birth defects, etc.) was more severe.
2006-08-08 07:53:36 · answer #1 · answered by Mike S 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on what is used. Believe me you rather ask yourself how soon Earth environment will allow only cockroach to live on its surface. I am not thinking of wars. Developed countries life style is full of polluting chemicals and production. I have something special for You. Tell me how electrical energy is produced for hybrid cars in percent of all electrical energy production. We are ling ourselves. How many planes flies now on sky? How dangerous suns rays are now and will be next year?
2006-08-08 09:46:24 · answer #2 · answered by Robert M Mrok (Gloom) 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Quite a lot. Just imagine if WW1 WW2 Vietnam and many other wars didn't happen, the climate would be much more stable
2006-08-10 07:42:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
not much, just lot of people get blown up. Bush gets to manufacture more arms and more job creation for the Yanks.
2006-08-11 23:51:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Napalm is generally bad for trees and bushes.
2006-08-08 11:21:29 · answer #5 · answered by kristycordeaux 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Negligible. Signed Israel.
2006-08-08 07:47:38 · answer #6 · answered by Spotlight 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nothing compared to the rest of the pollution we generate
2006-08-08 09:01:46 · answer #7 · answered by mike L 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ask usa, they will blatantly say who geeeves a daym
2006-08-09 09:57:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
None.
2006-08-08 07:52:44 · answer #9 · answered by Richard B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋