how would you rank races of people...?

Question

in order of how valuable they are as people?

k, but i know you must like some people more than others...
maybe you find white people most attractive, maybe asians

info, you're the closest so far.

white
asian
spanish
monkey
black

(for example)

Answer 1

I sure hope George sees this. It's going to blow his mind.

Answer 2

1. Cats
2. Dogs
3. Cockroaches
4. Humans

Answer 3

The term race distinguishes one population of humans (or non-humans) from another. The most widely used human racial categories are controversially based on visible traits (especially skin color and facial features), genes, and self-identification. Conceptions of race, as well as specific racial groupings, vary by culture and over time and are often controversial, for scientific reasons as well as their impact on social identity and identity politics.

Since the 1940s, evolutionary scientists have rejected the view of race according to which a number of finite lists of essential characteristics could be used to determine a like number of races. For example, the convention of categorizing the human population based on human skin colors was used, but hair colors, eye colors, nose sizes, lip sizes, and heights were not. Many evolutionary and social scientists think common race definitions, or any race definitions pertaining to humans, lack taxonomic rigour and validity. They argue that race definitions are imprecise, arbitrary, derived from custom, and that the races observed vary according to the culture examined. They further maintain that "race" as such is best understood as a social construct, and conceptualize and analyze human genotypic and phenotypic variation in terms of populations and clines1 instead. Other scientists, however, have argued that this position is motivated more by political than scientific reasons. They argue that categories of self-identified race/ethnicity or biogeographic ancestry are both valid and useful, that these categories correspond with clusters inferred from multilocus genetic data, and that this correspondence implies that genetic factors might contribute to unexplained phenotypic variation between groups.

1. In population genetics, a cline is a gradual change of a character or feature (phenotype) in a species over a geographical area, often as a result of environmental heterogeneity. The change in phenotype does not result in different species as long as the geographically spread populations can interbreed with one another. This meaning of cline was introduced by Sir Julian Huxley.

A ring species is a special kind of cline where the geographical distribution in question is circular in shape, so that the two ends of the cline overlap with one another, giving two adjacent populations that rarely interbreed due to the cumulative effect of the many changes in phenotype along the cline. The populations elsewhere along the cline interbreed with their geographically adjacent populations as in a standard cline.

Answer 4

You are a racist pig!!! Who are you to judge people anyways? Grow up and get a life already.

Answer 5

Simple, we are all one race HUMAN, so we all rate # 1

Answer 6

I rate everyone #1, well everyone but you, or like you. You need to change your attitude, its not going to get you far.

Answer 7

I value all people equally

Answer 8

To me,they're all on ground level!

Answer 9

That you could even verbalize that sentence proves you are one sick pup.

Answer 10

WHAT THE **** KIND OF QUESTION IS THIS???EVERYONE IS EQUAL!!!