The sexual attraction towards animals is called 'bestiality'.
The 'order' that you speak of is highly insulting. You have a bright future ahead of you as a fundamentalist preacher. You might want to check out www.godhatesfags.com for more ideas about your noble cause...
2006-08-08 03:33:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by XYZ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
This information was cut and paste, see the direct link:
Zoophilia, from the Greek Ζωο (zôon, "animal") and φιλία (philia, "friendship" or "love"), is a paraphilia, defined as an affinity or sexual attraction by a human to a (non-human) animal. Such individuals are called zoophiles. The more recent terms zoosexual and zoosexuality describe the full spectrum of human/animal orientation. A separate term, bestiality (more common in mainstream usage and frequently but incorrectly seen as a synonym), refers to human/animal sexual activity. To avoid confusion about the meaning of zoophilia — which may refer to the affinity/attraction, paraphilia, or sexual activity — this article uses zoophilia for the former, and zoosexual activity for the sexual act. The two terms are independent: not all sexual acts with animals are performed by zoophiles; and not all zoophiles are sexually interested in animals.
Common culture is generally hostile to the concept of animal/human sexuality. While some, such as philosopher and animal rights author Peter Singer, argue that zoophilia is not unethical if there is no harm or cruelty to the animal, this view is not widely shared; sexual acts with animals are generally condemned as "crime against nature" and/or animal abuse.
There is presently considerable debate in psychology over whether certain aspects of zoophilia are better understood as an aberration or as an orientation. The activity or desire itself is no longer classified as a pathology under DSM-IV (TR) (the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association) unless accompanied by distress or interference with normal functioning on the part of the person, and research has broadly been supportive of at least some of zoophiles' central claims. Critics point out that that DSM-IV says nothing about acceptability or the well-being of the animal, and many critics outside the field express views that sexual acts with animals are always either abusive or unethical. Defenders of zoosexuality argue that a human/animal relationship can go far beyond sexuality, and that animals are capable of forming a genuinely loving relationship that can last for years and which is not functionally different from any other love/sex relationship.
There is much more regarding terminology origins and about the sexual nature of it all.
2006-08-08 03:38:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by gravelgertiesgems 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
issues that truthful Christian could stay away from isn't restricted to what the Bible is particular in banning. as an get at the same time, see this fact unequivocally: "the marriage is honorable between all marital mattress and spotless, because God the decide fornicate and adulterers." (Hebrews 13:4) Even non-Christians and those who do no longer recognize something about Bible properly finish that the verse prohibits adultery. This and different biblical texts make it clean that God condemns sexual kinfolk contributors between a married man or woman and yet another that is no longer their valid better 1/2. yet to say of two unmarried those who practice oral sex? Many little ones say there is no longer something incorrect with that, because that's not sexual. Can a Christian considered oral sex as something organic? Hebrews 13:4 and a million Corinthians 6:9 God disapproves state that both adultery and fornication to (the Greek porn). What precisely is fornication? The Greek time period contains using the genitals with reason immoral, both organic and so pervert. contains all sorts of illicit sexual kinfolk contributors outside of marriage licensed with the help of the Scriptures. as a effect, it contains oral sex, even besides the undeniable fact that many little ones international huge were recommended, or come to the top, that this custom is suitable. the actual Christian does no longer handbook his way of wondering and their movements with the help of the reviews of "conversations blunders and deceptive of the recommendations." (Titus a million:10) They keep on with the utmost standard, that of Scripture. truly of looking for excuses to practice oral sex, they believe that biblically it truly is fornication, or porn, and prepare in accordance to their judgment of acceptable and incorrect. - Acts 21:25, a million Corinthians 6:18, Ephesians 5:3.
2016-11-23 15:53:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well at least it isn't pedopyrohomonecrobestiality.
Having sex with a young, flaming, dead animal, of the same sex.
2006-08-08 03:40:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Webster's dictionary also calls animal sex: sodomy.
Kinda of changes your perspective (for the ickier) on the Sodom and Gomorrah story, doesn't it?
2006-08-08 03:50:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bobby E 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sex with animals is bestiality. Sex with dead animals would, I guess, be necrobestiality.
2006-08-08 03:34:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe sex with dead animals would be called 'necrozoophilia'.
The bible tends to lump homosexual sex and sex with animals together as 'sodomy'.
2006-08-08 03:34:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by kheserthorpe 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
beastiality or zoophilia and it has been around since the beginning...
2006-08-08 03:36:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think for u is maternal love
2006-08-08 03:40:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by papichulo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i just threw up in my mouth
2006-08-08 03:35:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by fmfcorpsmenrsexy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋