Would you support another invasion like the one in Iraq?

Question

I will try to be fair. Would you support an invasion in North Korea or Iran based on information from the CIA or NSA? Lets say, that the sanctions failed and Iran has decided to halt oil production in order to create a world crisis and we have similar information to the kind we had before we entered Iraq.

Answer 1

No, I would not support another invasion like Iraq. War should be used only in defensive circumstances. A preemptive strike against another nation such as Iraq is wrong and I cite what has happened in Iraq as an example. We by invading a sovereign country have created one huge mess. It will degenerate into a civil war with outcome unknown and it may end up to be worse then it was with Saddam.

Answer 2

Well, North Korea has no right to exist as a nation in the first place, because they were created by the former USSR for the sole purpose of expanding communism abroad, and to this day make their people starve to death while they lie to them about how life is in South Korea and arm communist terroist groups like the Japanese Red Army and Philippine "New People's Army," so yes, I'd support an invasion of North Korea.

Answer 3

No, North Korea was a total failure, and as far as Iran , it was needed to stop the murdering of women and children, but we went about it the wrong way. We should have used covert action to simultaneously kill all heads of states and their minims, before totally infiltrating the country. Cutting off the head doesn't mean tearing down a statue. We have had a lot of casualties on both sides, and that could have been avoided. Not that wouldn't have been casualties, but a lot could have been avoided. Now the people hate us, because we have also killed the innocent. Casualties of War is no excuse when we have the ability to avert it.

Answer 4

If Iran halted oil production we would not need to invade. The shock to their economy would be so extreme that the government would have to be overthrown as the factories could not sell, the GDP drops precipitously, and nobody has extra money to even buy the basics. When Iranians are unable to afford bread, then the nuclear program will seem inconsequential.

Answer 5

I didnt support the invasion in Iraq in the first place. That having been said i believe that Iran needs to be closely monitored but i don't believe an all out assault is the way to do it.

Answer 6

no way!!! you americans can't understand what Bush is trying to do... if you don't know, Iran has powerful allies(Russia and China), and if the american troops even try to step into Iran and take over the oil suplies there, Russia and China will attack any NATO country and eventually THE USA... and for your information, i'm not ever Iranian, Russian or Chinese...
I live in a NATO country and I'dd be in imediate danger if the americans attack Iran

Answer 7

Heavens NO. That was a dishonest mistake and Bush should be held accountable for the many lives lost. It is one of the most tragic events in my lifetime and the repercussions will last long beyond my lifetime. Bush is the most dangerous person in the world today.

Answer 8

Isn't it up to Iran if they want to produce oil or not? Do you really feel you have the right to force Iran to sell you its oil? Militarily?

I'd like to see your face if the Iranians started invading Texas, lots of oil being hoarded there eh? Or is that another lie?

Answer 9

Given the Intel that was provided WORLD WIDE to all leaders, yes I would support another invasion. This one is a gimme.

Answer 10

YES,but forget all this b/s about being careful where to drop a bomb.War is war,Bomb the h*** out of iran and north korea too.What about civilians?,bomb them to ! , they support terriosts,they hate anything that is good.War is war,bomb them till there is nothing left,and be done with it.STOP trying to have a friendly war.