his public defender is saying that he most likely get 9-16 months and he has already served 6 and has yet to be arraigned. he has no prior record and the robbery was unarmed. he supposedly got away with 7 grand. i was just wondering how realistic is it for him to get 9-16 months considering this crime? it seems like too much of a lenient sentence for a crime like this. please answer if u have knowledge of the law and please serious answers only!
2006-08-08 01:09:12 · 6 answers · asked by John D 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
?
2006-08-08 01:13:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If he's been locked up, charged with bank robbery and incarcerated for 6 months, then he has been arraigned. More than likely if his PD is saying 9-16 it is years, not months.
2006-08-08 09:22:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i live in pa and I'm a correctional officer i never heard of a sentence like that are u sure it's not 9 to 16 years that makes more sense,
2006-08-08 08:14:58 · answer #3 · answered by uofsmike 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
At least. He has serve some of his time.. They will count. time he has already served. As time served..
2006-08-08 08:44:57 · answer #4 · answered by Daris G 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not trying to be mean, but you need to get better friends.
2006-08-08 08:15:13 · answer #5 · answered by sheeny 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This question is waking up sleeper cells, isn't it?
2006-08-11 16:58:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋