If I had to choose between (100 people) or (1endangered animal)to live ...who?
No Question I would pick the innocent Animal...... there are way too many savages(people) spreading hate,war ,disease around the world the world would be a better place without 3billion people..yes?????? what you think?
2006-08-07 23:39:39 · 8 answers · asked by ZULUkilla 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
I aggree with you.
2006-08-08 00:56:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I'd take out the animal, first of all, you have to look at 3 billion savages, I doubt all 3 billion are all savages....maybe the militants, but that's another thread.
Now, look at it from another side....say you have a family of 6, you just bought a beautiful spot of land, you're already building the house, when some punk from the city walks up, looks through your grass on your property, slaps a violation paper in your hand, and orders you to fork over 20,000 dollars, for building in a zone that's considered nesting area for some frog?
that's happened in california....now, you've lost any chance at getting your money back, you have to move back into the two bedroom apartment, and you have a worthless, half completed house to deal with. Is that fair?
To a greater degree, sure, it's a shame some animals go extinct...but has the whooping crane ever made a vaccine? has a dodo bird ever built a skyscraper? No...because, as the top of the ladder, mankind has bettered himself, with technology to avoid our own destruction. If you want to die, to save and animal, go right ahead....but don't expect the animal to feel any different about you.....it'll probably hop away.
2006-08-07 23:51:07 · answer #2 · answered by steveraven 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Totally depends on the endangered animal. Are you talking about a spotted slug or a panda bear? I mean, there is a HUGE difference between the two. Thus, without proper information, I cannot make the choice.
2006-08-08 08:14:16 · answer #3 · answered by Goose&Tonic 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hhhhhhmmmm........let's see.......all the bad ppl in the world are considered as animals so yep animals such as the bad ppl do not need to exist anymore just like the animals that run our countries!!
2006-08-08 00:18:12 · answer #4 · answered by Tigerlilly 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your question did not mention 100 evil people.
2006-08-07 23:47:35 · answer #5 · answered by peppermint_paddy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
M/s Bush & Blair and their counter part in Israel.
2006-08-08 02:20:32 · answer #6 · answered by mushtaqehind 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as you're one of the hundred, cool by me...
2006-08-07 23:45:28 · answer #7 · answered by SirCharles 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the people.animals taste to good to keep.
2006-08-07 23:43:46 · answer #8 · answered by glock509 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋