English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-07 23:25:58 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

9 answers

No one can prove that. That is truly impossible

2006-08-07 23:29:52 · answer #1 · answered by Jon H 5 · 0 0

the idea of god is that this would be a know all , be all , powerful creator. no man would be even close to how much god is.

right..right

then why is the person who has done the most and best for me is my mom. a person
why is the ones that have taught me the most are people
why is it the ones that actually save lives a rescue workers and doc. which again are people
if god was only as good as people are than i would be able to share some of the things that i know god has done.

nothing, thats what god does
jesus will come back..people though 100 years, than 1000, 2000,

brilliant were those who first concidered god
embarrassing are those that still do

2006-08-07 23:34:52 · answer #2 · answered by dogpoundcakemix 1 · 0 0

All reasoned arguments rely on axioms, i.e. things which we take to be true, but which are not amenable to proof. The most obvious example of an axiom is the validity of reason itself - It is trivially obvious that we can't use a reasoned argument to prove that reason is valid, because we have to presume that reason is valid in order to make any kind of reasoned argument.

I have another axiom, which I'm sure no sane person would dispute: That the order and complexity that we see around us in the natural universe, and particularly in the intricate structure and functions of living organisms, could not possibly just exist fully formed, with no cause, no origin, no precursor of any sort. I can't *prove* that this is the case, but it seems inconceivable to me that anyone would dispute it.

So, the logical consequence of accepting this axiom is that, for the very same reason, it's not possible that the order and complexity of the universe is sourced in an intelligent deity who designed and made the universe and *himself* exists fully formed with no cause, no origin, no precursor of any sort. I don't think any reasonable person would dispute the axiom presented here, and acceptance of the axiom leads to an indisputable proof of the non-existence of an intelligent creator.

Anyone who (against all reason) asserted that the order and complexity we see in the universe *could* indeed exist fully formed with no cause and no origin, in order thereby to save the concept of an uncaused intelligent designer, would find that they had invalidated said designer by making him redundant - i.e. if the order and complexity of the universe could just exist fully formed and uncaused then it would not need (in fact, could not possibly have) a designer to cause it to exist.

Either way, the concept of a creator is invalidated.

2006-08-07 23:39:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Who can prove there is no Godmanod?
Who can prove there is no Dimwagod?
Who can prove there is no Umgodwangler?

2006-08-07 23:52:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You proved it by asking the question.

Congratulations.

2006-08-07 23:30:45 · answer #5 · answered by Left the building 7 · 0 0

Nobody will ever prove that there is no God, which is why religions persist and why religious conflict will always persist.

2006-08-07 23:29:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Um I think George Burns already did. Um, Yep.

2006-08-07 23:33:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Get lost with such sort of question

2006-08-07 23:33:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I can.

I just need your definition of god first.

2006-08-07 23:29:21 · answer #9 · answered by upallnite 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers