Life is about 'survival of the fittest', so are 'nukes' the only way to sort things out in the middle east?

Answer 1

Perhaps there are other plans in the works that we are only now becoming aware of. Check this out. Some would call this a BAD sign of coming attractions.

http://www.thepowerhour.com/press_release/press19.htm

Answer 2

Survival almost precludes the use of nukes by definition alone. The half life of certain radioactive agents used in these special weapons would lay waste to the entire region. Unless someone wants to use neutron weapons. There is always a better way than nukes.

Answer 3

Try filling your tank with radioactive gas. And do you really want to just kill everyone? That is surely survival of the fittest. If Iran gets a nuke does that make them the fittest?

Answer 4

Bad bad bad!
Sometimes the "fittest" also includes having the brains to moderate your use of force.
I think (yesterday was the 61st anniversary of Hiroshima) that the original displays of nuclear destruction was an important lesson to all. They were fire crackers compared to the devices available today.
The West will need to admit that this is a battle for the supremacy of East vs. West culture, and decide if they will relinquish, or what they will do about it if they decide not to. Merely attempting to stop the current flare up will only lead to the next one, again and again.

Answer 5

Not only NUKES but assorted Bio/nerve gasses, bird flu or the old standby like we did he homo's and blacks the big AIDS
There is always another way some better than others. In the case of he mid-east NUKES are the best tool for the job

Answer 6

Nukes are not the answer.
But i agree that it's about time the civilised world flattened the ME and brought some peace to the World. What's up with them all over there?

Answer 7

Nothing will sort out thing in the middle east

Answer 8

It seems everyone forgotten that sometimes nature allow COWARDS to survive . Of course they mostly create degeneration of their species strength. But weak parents can sometimes generate strong children like strong - sometimes weak. Do You see clear difference. I see rather too much similarity. Difference is only in behaviour. If someone kill he shows weakness. The strongest one is someone who have reverence from everyone, is treat as friend and wise person, he don't have to prove his strength because he use it only when needed, his strength is courage, strong will, faith, devotion to wisdom and live among others, not only stupid physical strength. If someone tells you that we have "democracy" and "civilised" world then send him back to school again and again, until he understand differences at least between terms of "form of government" and "social system".

Answer 9

I beg to differ with you: We live in a civilized world with civilized values. We donot live in a jungle where we have to defend ourselves to stay alive..One of the values that civilized people have and should practice is to do unto others what you would do for yourself. This and other values are what separates us from lower animal forms.
You are an example of why video games are a dangerous medium for our younger generation. It changes your attention span and patience and your ability to relate to other human beings.
Nukes indeed - how stupid -radioactive oil canot be used for many years to come.!

Answer 10

no way,,,! nukes is for weak people. weak people and wrong people uses force to make other accept what they have to say. they cant resort to diplomacy because are wrong as we see Israel are doing. and then with the help of propaganda they are winning people hearts.