If Genesis had not been included in the Bible would you be so skeptical of evolution?

Question

We have so much good proof for it. But it is based on what we know from skeletons that are millions of years old. How the hell can you expect any theory about something so old to have all the proof it needs to prove itself completely? And the fact that their are missing links and that we can't explain everything (although very little isn't covered which you would know if you bothered to read outside of your religious propoganda) only proves that we are human not that the theory is incorrect. Open your mind.

Why it isn't a religion. Evolution is a scientific theory based on what fact we can infer from extremely ancient bones. So where there are holes (really not as numerous as you would claim and far overshadowed by the things that fit) we assume that NATURAL processes took place in those spaces just as they did in so many other places with all the links. This is not faith, its a fact based assumption, not a belief based guess to justify things we don't know.

So if Genesis didn't directly oppose this fine theory would you really still refute it? And if you say yes are you willing to admit that you just can't imagine the scenario if that's the case?

Answer 1

Just to add a few more solid points to this debate…

Don’t forget that evolution is not just about the human condition. We have perfect fossil examples of interspecies changes in other mammals. Also, geological processes are very gradual and their huge time scales can be easily seen to add up to many millions of years. Just count the seasonal sedimentary layers in the Grand Canyon (strata changes over seasons so you can even observe repeated, annual changes in various layers – not something that would come about if the earth’s sediment were laid out in a great flood), and after you’ve counted off 10,000 years you will have exceeded the age of the bible but still only be a tiny fraction of the way through the layers of the Grand Canyon. Stars also undergo change and we can see all manner of stellar development in many examples of stars throughout the sky. Such examples prove that the universe is billions of years old and still changing.

By the way, almost everything flyersbiblepreacher said is wrong, except for the part about false assumptions leading to false conclusions…but that would also explain a lot about his beliefs.

Answer 2

If Genisis did not exist I might still question evolution. Neither, are scientific facts, but if you want to argue probability... Not all things of the Bible have been proven, but nothing as of yet has been disproven, and a lot of things have been proven lending to the idea of the Bible being a reliable history book. While, not much supporting evolution has been proven.
Either way, neither are scientific fact and until then, both are beliefs/faiths, whether you choose to make a religion out of it is up to you. Personally, I'm not religious, but I do believe in the bible, thus creation. I am open minded, but after a lot of research, creation seems to be better supported than evolution.
BTW, if evolution is true, then why did we, and all other life forms stop evolving? if anything, we are devolving, look at us compared to our ancestors, if we could go back in time we'd be embarrased.

Answer 3

be arranged...this might in all likelihood be long, by way of fact i went by using the comparable component whilst i grow to be your age. I grew up interior the south, the Bible belt. My mothers and fathers made the determination to no longer impact me Religiously. My dad's father grow to be very Baptist and my dad hated it becoming up. My entire mom's facet is the two Lutheran or Minknight (sp?) So residing interior the Bible belt at an incredibly impressionable age and being the only youngster in my type that had not at all attended church made me the guffawing inventory exterior of my community of friends. i won't be ready to count selection how many situations human beings had asked me if i've got been saved (which i had/have been). I over got here that, and discovered that my real friends favourite me as i grow to be. final 3 hundred and sixty 5 days grow to be the 1st 3 hundred and sixty 5 days that i grow to be relatively taught the excellent Evolutionary theory. I agreed with it, and nevertheless do to a undeniable volume. residing in a greater open minded area relatively helped plenty too. yet now, I relatively have witnessed too many stuff happen to assert that there is not any longer a Divine writer. So the way i placed it the technological know-how and the religion at the same time is that, whilst god made human beings, micro organism, monkeys, lions ect...that he did no longer waste a single piece of cloth. and that's why our DNA is so heavily concerning that of a monkeys and what no longer. and that's the only component that links us all at the same time the consumer-friendly thread that weaves this patch artwork at the same time. all of it boils all the way down to having faith, the two having faith that a single divine being created the earth, or having faith that each little thing developed from eukaryotes. it incredibly is the comparable critical. yet i for my section have a theory that guy style made up God and faith to have some type of a few thing to lean on and to reassure themselves. As for heaven and hell, i haven't figured that one out only yet. you're no longer a foul guy or woman for believing such as you do. do no longer enable everyone inform you different. Sorry that grow to be so long

Answer 4

If Genesis didn't exist, I still wouldn't believe in evolution, because science and history would still oppose it.

Most of the so-called 'evidence' is a handful of bones which wouldn't cover a pool table. The geologic column doesn't exist anywhere outside of a textbook, and in countless places the different strata are "out of order." Darwin had no education in biology - he was a preacher. His work was based on Charles Lyell's work on geology, but he had no education in geology - he was a lawyer.

Evolution is NOT "a fact based assumption"; it's based first and foremost on the assumption that God doesn't exist. Start with a false assumption, and you'll get false conclusions.

Answer 5

I believe evolution is obvious.

At the same time, I believe in God and the Bible.

About the only good explanation is that millions of years came between the some of the 1st six days referenced in Genesis.

Answer 6

Who is skeptical? Most Christians traditions allow followers accept evolution. To many faiths, actual man starts with Abraham and the rest can be interpreted as metaphor.

Answer 7

I'd probably be more inclined to believe in it. However, that may also be because I probably wouldn't care about -- just like I don't care about thousands of other scientific theories.
Still, there are some big problems with evolution.

Answer 8

what people conveniently forget is that the friggin bible was written when most of the world thought the sun was a god...

all religion is, is a way to explain why things go bump in the night and to put the fear of what happens after death to rest...

boil down ALL the religions of the world and they all have this same basic structure...

Answer 9

Who cares! just believe what you want to, and don't try to change others minds. the only person you should truly be worrying about is yourself. i'm so sick and tired of the evolution darwinism, crap it's annoying so stop always trying to be right. In the end it won't matter.

Answer 10

I believe in both. I think God created the Earth and everything on it then evolution happened.