It seems that the majority that I asked, not all online but mostly in real life, don't know.
Answer yes or no if know about it but if you havent, heres a link...
If you want to hear a brief 4 minute speech(recommended) about it just click on Audio(its highlighted red, you cant miss it)
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/08/20060805.html
My opinion: I think it's a good compremise for both sides, get rid of early illegals that have no roots in America and keep the ones that are basically American because of time. This country converts people into Americans. Please consider it, we need to act, not argue about this anymore.
2006-08-07 11:55:22 · 7 answers · asked by Someone 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
No it isn't. It is step one in SPP, check out SPP.gov.
Due to chain immigration of families above quotas it would further flood our schools and degrade our services.
The Senate Bill is a horror-show. We need to start over, and start with real border security, not temporary assignment of troops who aren't allowed to do anything even while they are there. We need barriers as well as technology, and no one trusts Bush on immigration any more. He took an oath to uphold our laws, and whatever happened to that?
I voted for him twice, and I feel absolutely betrayed.
He just wants slave labor for big business and doesn't care that the upward mobility through education of our own children will be ruined in the process. We would be paying for the 'benefits' of his work force, and the price our children are already paying for illegal immigration is already unacceptable.
We need limited immigration designed to protect our schools and services.
Poor people, even if they pay all taxes pay very little of their cost in education and health care, etc. That is why our current laws limit immigration of poor people to begin with. Just saying 'now it is legal' doesn't make the impact go away.
The total numbers are too great.
2006-08-07 12:04:27 · answer #1 · answered by DAR 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's too much compromise. We also need to kick out any with a criminal record, those who have used more than one name, and those who can not prove their whereabouts and activities for the entire time they have been here. And what about the ones who haven't been here long but came to join their families? They anchor onto each other and cry pitifully for us to not break up their huge families. As we can't take them all they need to go home if they all want to be together. We have been more than fair and now it's time to get tough.
2006-08-07 12:10:39 · answer #2 · answered by DJ 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't compromise like the traitor Bush! Join the CSA! Compromise? What a chicken $hit! If their is a compromise, I call for impeachment! If you think those rallies were impressive just wait until the US militia backed by millions goes off!
2006-08-07 11:59:41 · answer #3 · answered by tripledigit67 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you kidding? this whole board is about all that encounters - the begining of the end of democracy and the rise of facism!!!
We do need to act - with passing more laws and deportations en masse the economics are in bud
deport them - 250 billion once
keep them here - 1/2 trillion a year and rising
freedom - priceless
look up spp/nasco/NAFTU/CAFTA don't tell me your for it!
Comprehensive reform is SUICIDE
2006-08-07 12:11:55 · answer #4 · answered by yars232c 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You can tell someone a part of the story and not the rest so that they will agree with you.
That my friend is called a LIE.
2006-08-07 12:51:46 · answer #5 · answered by sincerely, see me 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The presidents plan sucks.
2006-08-07 14:31:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
ok thank
2006-08-07 11:59:29 · answer #7 · answered by idontkno 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋