First off i would make him serve at least ten years in prison,with the general population so they get regular slaps etc..Then tell them that they can go and let em through a door,where the members of the victims family are waiting..The family can all try out torture on his a*s
and beat him almost to death..Then its into another room where two really hefty rottweilers are waiting to eat the sicko...
2006-08-07 07:03:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
death is too good for these maggots. why let them get off easy; their victims didn't. how about cutting their **** off completely then blinding them so in case they ever get out, they won't be tempted by being able to look at kids. i say let the victims and their families take care of this by any means they wish, they're also free to take as long as they want. the only things are no anesthesia and killings are allowed. oh, they should also feel free to take other liberties such as beatings, rapings and what not. after they're done, then u can donate what's left to science for medical experiments instead of using animals. trust me, a few sessions with the perp will save the victims and their families years in therapy.
2006-08-07 07:29:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by lady sixx 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
listed right here are basically some verifiable data on the subject of the death penalty- this subject is in simple terms too significant to decide without understanding them. All of those data talk over with america. The death penalty isn’t a deterrent. homicide expenses are bigger in states that have the death than in states which don't have it. maximum people who dedicate homicide do not think of they are going to be caught (in the event that they think of in any respect.) The death penalty equipment expenses lots greater advantageous than a equipment that doesn't have the death penalty. lots of those greater advantageous expenses come way in the previous the appeals start up. (This money might desire to be spent on sufferers centers, that are underfunded.) Over one hundred twenty human beings on death rows have been released with data of their innocence. some had spent many years on death row. dashing up the equipment will assure the execution of an harmless guy or woman. After an execution, the case is closed. If the incorrect guy or woman grew to become into accomplished the genuine killer remains obtainable. further and extra states (40 8 out of fifty) have existence without parole on the books. It ability what it says and is not any picnic to be locked up for 23 of 24 hours an afternoon, continuously. The death penalty could be very not user-friendly on the families of homicide sufferers. because of the fact the approach is going on they are compelled to relive their ordeal interior the courts and interior the media. existence without parole is advantageous and rapid and frequently appealed. Opposing the death penalty does not propose you excuse brutal crimes or have faith murderers might desire to circulate unpunished. It ability you're using undemanding sense. Revenge isn't a clever foundation for finding out this.
2016-12-11 08:58:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would give the offender a choice, Life with NO possibly of parole or 1 hour alone with the family of the victim. Would take complete care of the possibility of re-offending because there would be none on parole and after an hour alone with the victims family, there'd be no re-offenders either. If you are innocent, take the life sentence and let the appeal process work and if you are guilty, the punishment would fit the crime. Judges would have no descretion
2006-08-07 07:06:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bob D 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
First castrate them with a saw with no pain killers. Then leave the wound open and fill with maggots. Now dig a hole in the desert, fill it with those flesh eating ants and bury the paedophile with only his head sticking out. Also cut out his tongue so that he can't scream. Leave him there. Come back after 3 days. If he's alive let him go. If not...oh well.
2006-08-07 22:27:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ni Ten Ichi Ryu 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Put them in max security prison(life with no parole of course)...and leak that they were a paedophile to the worst of the worst that are imprisoned there and let the prison food chain take its course.
Castration...physical or chemical will not work. Because they would continue doing the same thing...just using foreign objects to do it.
2006-08-07 06:58:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by akebhart 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Incarceration until they no longer pose a risk to the public.
That may mean a whole life sentence.
That may not be as extreme as some of the other options but if you look carefully nigh on all the western jurisdictions ban corporal punishment of any variety.
2006-08-07 07:46:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by MontyBob 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am tired of this obsession with Paedophiles. You always get the same knee jerk reactions. I wonder how many of those that are obsessed with Paedophilia, are in agreement with abortion. To me, that is a far worse crime, the ultimate in child abuse. So, start banging on about that. You wont, because it is not popular to do so and would upset too many feminists and lefty/liberal types.
2006-08-07 09:44:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Veritas 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would bring back some medieval torture because putting them to death or life imprisonment just doesn't quite cause the suffering I feel they have brought upon there selves by such a sickening vile crime.
2006-08-07 07:10:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Question???...All those people who assume paedophiles have testicles....what about the ones who lack this piece of anatomy?
The assumption is that castration works...but paedophile behaviour is about power and its in the head...you don't need a penis to abuse someone...fingers...eyes...anything can be used to abuse you don't need the obvious!
So how do we deal with the dangerously mentally ill??
2006-08-07 07:53:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by lippz 4
·
0⤊
0⤋