English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I asked the unborn child question and I wanted to see what other people had to say. for all of those who said I sound immature, I am not. I am ready to be a mother and my child is not going to be given up for adoption when both parents are there for the baby and we want the baby. selfish women do not let good men see their children. I am not selfish and i would never threaten the life of my child for some man who wants to be a family with me. I have a head on my shoulders that tells me to not be with him if I do not trust him. I am having the baby because we made it and now i am going to take care of it with him. and he wants me to have the baby and his parents and everybody else. I just wanted to ask a question to see how people would respond.

2006-08-07 03:55:07 · 23 answers · asked by toucheandtootise 1 in Pregnancy & Parenting Other - Pregnancy & Parenting

23 answers

sounds like you brought it on yourself

2006-08-07 03:59:22 · answer #1 · answered by onefatwhiteguy 2 · 0 0

ive had rude answers too, people not paying attention to all the details, people thinking they know everything (like they have never asked a question that was "immature" or juvenille). dont let those people's answers bother u because this site is supposed to be helpful and informative not judgmental and rude...so its those immature people that throw in any two cents they have for whatever reason that are the dumbasses. i tell themu dont like the question move onto the next one there only over a million on here. theres no reason to say something thats offensive unless they just want to get points. u didnt do anything wrong and ure question im sure was exactly that "just a question" and disregard the other 10,000 13 year olds that have rude comments...dotn let it bother u :)

2006-08-07 04:05:54 · answer #2 · answered by toolate 3 · 0 0

You were the one who asked if you should threaten the child's life to control your boyfriend's behavior. They were just responding based on the information you gave them in your question. For those who did not see the question she asked, she asked if she should threaten her unborn child's life to get her cheating boyfriend to stay home!!!! This could have something to do with how she was treated. Some people have a problem with mothers threatening their children's lives!!!

2006-08-07 04:04:03 · answer #3 · answered by alone1with3 4 · 0 0

I don't know what the question was, so I obviously didn't see it, but something as personal as having a baby is between you and your husband. It is not even anything to do with his parents. And it is certainly nothing to do with the people here. They're a bunch of strangers and some of them are very rude. If you want a baby and you're happy - then that's all that matters.

2006-08-07 04:01:49 · answer #4 · answered by theophilus 5 · 0 0

Personally, people who have trouble spelling and punctuating concern me. The literacy rate in America floats in the 80% range and yet so many people who post here have a horrible time with grammar and spelling. Yes, I know my writing skills are not perfect by any means, but I have a fairly decent ability to create a sentence. I suppose I am perhaps a bit more judgemental of people who can not do what 80% of America is supposed to be able to do; especially when issues, like child rearing, are in question.

2006-08-07 04:00:19 · answer #5 · answered by mayyouponderthis 2 · 0 0

Are you married to this guy? Probably not right? Sorry, but it's always very immature to have children out of wedlock. If you were mature, you would have waited until marriage to have sex. You aren't the one paying for this, your baby is and if you want us to feel sorry for you, we aren't. The only person we should feel sorry for is your unborn child who will be tossed between families and caught in the middle his whole life because mom and dad just couldn't wait. If you want my honest opinion here it is: If this "guy" isn't committed enough to marry you, then he's not committed enough to have a kid with you. God bless.

2006-08-07 03:59:57 · answer #6 · answered by BeeFree 5 · 0 0

OH hun, some of the people on here are rude just cause they have nothing better to do. if you really want a place to go and talk to other moms and swap ideas then i have a palce just for that!! Come join me (mother of 3) and many others from around the world at Mommies 'R' Us "We are mommies, and enjoy the toughest job in the world. We are here to share ideas and stories in a family like atmosphere. Some of us have a few kids, and some have many, and they range in all ages. Most of us have very young ones at home. We are here to offer support to eachother and hopefully along the way build strong friendships to strengthen ones abilities as a mother, and a woman, WELCOME!" http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mommies_ru...
just click join and i will approve you to come in!

2006-08-07 03:59:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Why do you ask questions without giving enough details on a situation to allow others to answer?

If indeed you just asked to see how people would respond, you succeeded. Now you know how people respond.

By the way, a mature person would include enough information to get a complete answer.

2006-08-07 04:00:42 · answer #8 · answered by oklatom 7 · 0 0

Um, i think of the subject with this argument is that it tries to quantify life into quite simplistic words that mathematically attain your end, yet realistically instruct particularly not something in terms of morality. "Can mom and dad be judged morally evil for bringing little ones right into a merciless worldwide to go through just to reproduce?" this could require an entire slew of arguments which you do not furnish. If we are pondering the cruelty of the worldwide and the suffering that the common man or woman is going by way of in existence as quickly as we are pondering your question approximately morality, you could could desire to first instruct that the worldwide grew to become into merciless or crammed with suffering (sturdy good fortune with that, those are completely relativistic and subjective suggestions) with a view to instruct that there grew to become into loads of suffering that folk mandatory to be shielded from, some thing that's not universal. And if we gained't set up that folk could desire to be shielded from experiencing discomfort (a subjective and quite complicated concern), we don't have a controversy for the morality of growing to be existence. additionally, it sort of feels defective to characteristic a +a million to non-life. specific they don't adventure discomfort, yet in addition they don't adventure the non-adventure of discomfort. They adventure not something. Their non-life can not be something yet independent. particularly, non-life isn't universal here as being maximum appropriate to life, because of fact this argument assumes that each and all of the suffering and each and all of the excitement experienced by ability of a man or woman interior of their lifetime will, in all cases, volume to the same factor (-a million and +a million). this could't probable be the case each and all of the time. often i think of this could be a much extra useful argument for expert-determination advocates.

2016-11-04 01:38:43 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

You can't accuse people of being judgemental about something they don't have full details about, if you are the one who didn't provide all the details necessary to make a good judgement. People can only offer their opinion based on the facts given, or choose not to offer any opinion if they feel they don't know enough about the situation.

2006-08-07 04:09:21 · answer #10 · answered by angelbaby 7 · 0 0

Honestly it's because they can say whatever they want without fear of repercussion. You will find when people hide behind a computer monitor they will say things that they would not say if they had to look you in the eye. Miserable people feel better about themselves when they can belittle someone around them. It's the same reason people watch Jerry Springer.

2006-08-07 04:02:17 · answer #11 · answered by deniver2003 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers