Would this policy offer peace
The Arab nation (or organizations which support Israel’s enemies) and Israel’s allies should offer a real insurance policy so that would reduce attacks against Israel and reduce Israel retaliation—offering peace.
Israel must give land for peace: no more disputes about land.
If Israel is attacked by rockets, bombing, or kidnappings, Arab nations must pay Israel and victims X amount of dollars.
If Israel retaliates, United States and allies reduce Y amount foreign aid and military aid to Israel, allies must pay victims Z amount of dollars, and Israel lose insurance benefit from previous attacks.
2006-08-06 21:59:46 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Disincentive for terrorism: If terrorists attack Israel, terrorists through the insurance policy makes the Israeli state richer; Arab nation angry because they lose money; thus reducing the effectiveness of terrorism; thus, reducing terrorism all together.
Disincentive for retaliation: If Israel retaliates, they lose money and aid; make terrorist victims richer, and allies angry because they lose money under the insurance policy.
Possible outcome of policy: there are too many terrorist attacks and the Arab nation can’t pay the policy. Conclusion: through losing so much money, Arab nation will realize that Israel’s enemies are pure terrorists; policy cannot be honored, thus Israel must be allow to defend herself.
Also, if there are too many attacks from Israel. Conclusion: Israel is the real terrorist. Allies reduce aid to Israel. Israel has no more money to wage war.
Other outcome: no terrorist attack because of insurance policy. Peace. Finally.
2006-08-06 22:00:26 · update #1
Note: XYZ amount is unknown and must be “enough.”
2006-08-06 22:01:10 · update #2
that's just to much verbiage
Isreal must go.
2006-08-06 22:04:25 · answer #1 · answered by mumin azraaq 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Money has nothing to do with what is going on over there.
Israel has given back much of the land that they captured since 1967. What happened is that it allowed HAM-AZS to fire rockets deeper into Israel.
Won't work.
2006-08-07 05:31:52 · answer #2 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
LUCY YOU GOT SPLAININ TO DO!
WHY SHOULD THE US PAY FOR ANYTHING?
WE DON'T GIVE AWAY WEAPONS WE SELL THEM!
THE ARABS ALREADY STOLE THE OIL FIELDS, JUST HOW MUCH MORE DO YOU WANT THAT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO GET?
ISN'T OVERCHARGEING FOR THE OIL ENOUGH?
YOU SHOULD WATCH BIG JAKE!
THE TERRORISTS KIDNAPPED HIS GRANDSON!
BIG JAKE SAID " I ANIT GONA PAY'EM FOR THAT!"
2006-08-07 10:45:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋