How can religious figures, such as Pat Robertson, preach against democratically elected heads of state?

Question

Take that Robertson, who speaks "in the name of" some kind of what he views as God. How can he preach against democratically elected (and I mean without using the false propaganda portraying political rivals as "Nazis" and Jews as their "only" victims) heads of states such as Milosevic, may God avenge his death, who (unfortunately) wasn't a tough head of state or nationalist at all, but did (sometimes) help his people against the worst kind of terror, or Hugo Chavez, who rightly oppose today's best example of mass oppression-US imperialism & exploitation of the unfortunate?

Answer 1

Because Pat Robertson isn't really a Christian. He's just a wacko, nutjob, egomanical, sociopathic pseudo-Christian. Anyone that preaches that much hate and demented, rambling nonsense is obviously not mentally stable.

Answer 2

easy, as a results of fact Pat Robertson has freedom of speech, so he can say especially a lot despite he needs. whether he outright lies and says there's no such element as separation of church and state (november 1993), he nonetheless has the liberty to declare it (even though it does not make it actual).

Answer 3

When he called for the assasination of Chavez, that ended my career of watching the 700 club, even if it was 2 episodes in ten years to begin with.

Answer 4

good question.

I think he is just as corrupted as Hugo Chavez for making that statement; if the US as a whole would have wished to murder chavez they would have done it centuries ago.

The whole factor is, that we have a old fart that wants to make his opinions on the television and make everyone believe he is a bad ***.

I would love to see him murder chavez; and see his *** go to jail for it
If those are really his ideals he should go for it, and live in prison for a long time