Dawn of the Dead or Land of the Dead?

Question

me both there both kick *** i own Dawn of the Dead I want to also own land of the Dead!! it weird in land the zombies are slow and in Dawn there real fast strange does anyone know why they made them both diffenrent like that? cause I thought zombies were always slow

Answer 1

I like them both BUT I think Dawn was scary, and the land of the dead was just OK in the scare department. BUT I do love them both. I also own night of the living dead that is a classic.

Answer 2

Zombies kick ***. I love the Night of the Living Dead. Zombies should be slow, but maybe the ones in Dawn were brought up on Rob Zombie's music

Answer 3

Because the Dawn of the Dead you saw was a remake.

In the ORIGINAL George Romero version, they were slow (and even SCARIER, not like that "28 Days Later" ripoff).

and the BEST one was the original. NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD.

Answer 4

Dawn of the Dead but the spoof Shaun of the Dead was a hoot

Answer 5

Dawn of the Dead. There is a spoof of it from England called Shaun of the Dead. It is gory and hillarious.

Answer 6

Shaun of the Dead
(hilarious!)

however, Dawn of the Dead is much better
than Land of the Dead...IMHO

Answer 7

my vote goes to Shawn of the Dead. About time somone gave the zombie movie genre a kick in the butt. Otherwise, Romero's zombie movies rule.

Answer 8

Good question, I think zombies should be slow too especially since their body is usually decaying and falling apart. I guess it was simply the way the director wanted to do it.

Answer 9

dawn of the dead was awesome..haven't seen land of the dead..i heard it wasn't as good as dawn

Answer 10

I prefer dawn of the dead..and i guess they made them faster to make them scarrier and more of a theat