2006-08-06 16:29:51 · 18 answers · asked by wzr5gq20032000 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
beatles
2006-08-06 16:32:45 · answer #1 · answered by luve112 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Beatles
2006-08-06 23:56:59 · answer #2 · answered by Marie K 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely the Beatles. The Stones came after the Beatles and were just Beatles wannabes.
2006-08-07 00:43:13 · answer #3 · answered by Brandi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definately the Beatles, but the Stones are a good band.
The first Rolling Stones single was a Beatles song, written by Lennon/McCartney, titled: I Want To Be Your Man.
There wasn't so much a rivalry between the Beatles and the Stones in anything other than chart positions. The real competition was between Lennon/McCartney and Brian Wilson of the Beach Boys, who recorded some of the most experimental material of the 60s and 70s.
2006-08-10 20:23:28 · answer #4 · answered by Hawk In The Rain 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fact; The Beatles had more number one singles in their 8 year history than the Rolling Stones have had in their 40+ year run.
The Beatles have the highest number of record sales in the world than any other band in history.
Personally, I like the Beatles better because their music is much more melodic with interesting hooks, chord structure and harmony. The Rolling Stones songs are too repetitive and lack variety.
2006-08-10 14:19:44 · answer #5 · answered by Justin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Beatles!!
2006-08-07 19:45:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
When the stones start dying off like the beatles their star will rise much hihger than the beattles.
so stones
2006-08-06 23:34:22 · answer #7 · answered by petlover 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
John Lennon. The rest of the Beatles aren't blessed with that much talent.
2006-08-07 00:06:59 · answer #8 · answered by Skye 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
stones of course,
the beatles are too good
2006-08-06 23:38:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Stones, obviously.
2006-08-06 23:33:10 · answer #10 · answered by Dan M 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋