Did you prefer the David Lee Roth as lead singer or Sammy Hagar?
2006-08-06 16:00:04 · 23 answers · asked by Nelita C 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
Both had strong vocal talent, but as a definite better, would have to go to Van Halen/Sammy Hagar. More Albums, better songs, more records sold, and they had a better run of popularity, and as someone else said D.L.R. was annoying, and only a mediocre talent and the years have not been good to him, appearance wise or financially.
2006-08-06 16:06:42 · answer #1 · answered by thugtwin1@sbcglobal.net 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Van Halen and David lee roth will always RULE!! Sammy Hagar wasn't too exciting for me
2006-08-06 16:03:59 · answer #2 · answered by curiositykillsthecat 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Van Halen.
2006-08-06 16:13:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i liked van hagar better, mostly because sammy hagar is a writer..did you ever notice the cover tunes with david lee roth & van halen? hagar cranks out songs..originals, not covers... its a matter of taste i guess
2006-08-06 16:05:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Van Halen!!
2006-08-06 16:10:44 · answer #5 · answered by Arnold Ziffel 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Van Halen without Roth was hardly a band. It's too bad. They should reunite.
2006-08-06 16:03:57 · answer #6 · answered by candl91402 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Van Halen dudee, they rock!
of course Roth!
2006-08-06 16:05:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely Van Halen. Roth was such an awesome frontman.
2006-08-06 16:02:51 · answer #8 · answered by monkeyundead 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
"Diamond" David lee Roth rules and Hagar sucks!
2006-08-06 16:04:13 · answer #9 · answered by deleted 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let's be realistic, David Lee Roth is a showman but his voice is full of energy and it was what made the band so special.
2006-08-06 16:05:12 · answer #10 · answered by Lunny2006 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋