People don't like what another person has, and are jealous, greedy, etc. We hate each others' religions. Dare I go on?
We are emotionally bankrupt, and are looking for something out there, that really has to start from inside. We have no morals. We don't correct our kids.
By the time you add any number of things we do wrong, it will wind up adding to hate. And it is always easier to transfer hate to someone or something else, than to have to deal with what is wrong with us. And the way things are going, I doubt very seriously that we'll be able to correct the problem.
2006-08-06 22:19:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by John B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
how mad would you be to be permanently on 1000th of your present income? [doing the same work] - say, $50 a year instead of $50,000 a year
how mad would you be to be permanently on 100th of your present income? [doing the same amount of work] - say, $500 a year instead of $50,000 a year
how mad would you be to be permanently on 10th of your present income? [doing the same work] - say, $5000 a year instead of $50,000 a year
take an average of those and multiply by 5 billion
90% of people are on 10th to 1000th of the world average hourly pay
1% of people are on between the average and a million times the average world hourly pay - they get US$70 trillion a year
if no one was overpaid or underpaid, if everyone was paid the same hourly rate, everyone - including homemakers and tertiary students - would be on US$15 an hour - every family working average hard, on US$75,000 a year
paradise, plenty and peace
10 times as many people could afford the education to become scientists - science would go ahead ten times faster
if maximum fortunes were set at the just maximum, US$2 million [ie, the most a person can make, not just rake], and the overfortunes spread equally among everyone on earth, every man woman and child would get another US$20,000 a year, world markets would be ten times bigger, real income growth would be much higher, money would be much cheaper to borrow, there would be no superpowerful superrich tyrants sending us off to wars, no poor, far fewer diseases, no starvation, no poverty, no war, no misery
1% take 90% of world income - US$70 trillion a year - US$70,000 per family in the world - and they do less than 1% of the work
such overpay is responsible for the 50 million a year killed by starvation, the 50 million a year killed by violence, the 200 million seriously injured by violence, the 1 million girls sold into sex slavery a year, the 2 million people who go blind for lack of 4c of vitamin A a year, the millions of landmine amputees, etc, etc, etc
99% are underpaid - 99% would be better paid with fortunes limited to the maximum earnable, US$2 million, and there would be no hate, no war and very little crime
and we would not be racing towards extinction
we 99% allow 1% to take up to a million times more than they earn, and so 99% get less than they earn - 99% do over 99% of the work and get 10% of the world income
99% could prevail against 1% without conflict
so that 1% can be superoverpaid, we sacrifice 90% of our earnings, 99% of our happiness and peace, and 100% of our future
we 99% could demand the immediate equalisation of fortunes, which would immediately make 99% of people better off, [and with money they have made and earned], would immediately destroy all conflict and most crime, and 99.9999% of injustice, and destroy the great likelihood of extinction soon by continuing escalation of conflict
it wouldnt be perfectly just, but it would be infinitely more just than what we have
which is the product of millenia of increasing injustice, the rich getting richer etc
99% would be better off financially, and 100% would be better off [no violence, no danger, no unfriendliness, no extinction soon]
will we do so?
i would be delighted but very surprised if we do
we are not rational, we do not think, we just go with the flow, we have absolute faith in the flow, like lemmings - we can't hear anything that we havent heard before, we are positive we are doing the right thing, nothing can shake our faith in our rightness
millenia of escalation of war has not make us doubt ourselves or our path - we are 99% animals, with perfect faith that our instincts are good enough, though our reason has made us an artifical world, about which we must reason to control
can you imagine a crocodile having doubts about itself? - no - and we have a reptile brain
can the birds or animals doubt whether they are on the right path? - no - and we have an animal brain
our 1% rational thinking brain is overwhelmed by our animal faith - mother nature cannot be wrong - although we are no longer in nature
we cannot grasp our danger enough to put our brains to work, to see the reality - we are just so sure everything is fine
not one of your answerers mentioned injustice, theft of pay
yet everyone knows what would happen if a govt took 90% of income permanently off 90% of people and gave it to 1% - endlessly escalating war
because money buys all needs and almost all goods
yet no one is conscious of the role of injustice in war and hate - and no one wants to be, for some reason - they want to go on ignoring it, for some irrational reason
people are not going to think, they are going to die
they thought up specialisation of jobs, which necessitated exchange -
and pooling of the products of work, for mixing, to get the variety of things each wants, meant some could take out far more than they put in, meant that inequality, injustice, theft, could escalate endlessly, without intelligent intervention
and they cant think of it
paying one person $15 million an hour and another 1.5c an hour doesnt strike anyone as incorrect
how can they think of anything if they cant see that as incorrect?
the brainiest people in the world, people who can do the most complicated maths, cant see it!
wonderful stupidity! miraculous stupidity! most marvellous astounding curious stupidity!
2006-08-07 03:19:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋