English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If they weren't terrorists, then we would leave them alone. But they've proven themselves to be so why let them go? Take care of it now and in the future they'll know how to act.

2006-08-06 14:50:00 · 38 answers · asked by winger44 1 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

38 answers

Because as of yet, we're not Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union.

The Middle East is a big place, including Afghanistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Djibouti, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Gaza Strip, Georgia, Greece, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Turkey, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, West Bank, Yemen.

Want to bomb them all? Most of them are our allies.

2006-08-06 14:52:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

nicely your assumptions are somewhat twisted up, yet that only is going to coach usa can't only circulate bombing human beings. First, usa can't only circulate bombing N.Korea considering is S.Korea's call. S.Koreans are people who might lose tens of millions of people interior the conflict. 2nd, your assumption that China might look after N.Korea is misguided. China has already admitted that it helps a S.Korean led unification if the possibility arises. N.Korea is a discomfort in absolutely everyone's *** which incorporate China. S.Korea makes China money, N.Korea expenses them. third, usa will in all likelihood bomb Iran. China and Russia could be paid off to no longer get entangled. it incredibly is the main substantial reason usa hasn't finished it yet, it does not go with to pay the cost. For Iraq, the U. S. gave Russia and China extensive no bid oil contracts. Pakistan will stand via and watch as they have constantly finished. Pakistani governments are certainly offered and that they are impressive at suppressing the individuals. the U. S. will pay billions to Pakistan to maintain them in line. Over 10 billion in 7 years. that money enables the U. S. to do regardless of they go with which incorporate flying into Pakistan and aerial bombing it incredibly is cities and killing 20 Pakistani civilians to perhaps hit 2 or 3 Taliban insurgents.

2016-12-11 04:14:03 · answer #2 · answered by kull 4 · 0 0

We can blow away entire nations, without Nuclear weapons, we have MOABs. 22,000lb conventional smart bombs with nuke blast power but NO radiation.

M…..Mother
O…..of
A…..all
B…..bombs

WE have Tomahawks with fuel-air explosive war heads. The big Tomahawks can carry 10 war heads. They can burn entire cities with fuel-air explosive.

First the MOAB, when the shock wave clears, in comes the Tomahawk. The entire city is flattened and then burned with fuel-air explosive. The fuel-air explosive burns everything left and it burns off all the oxygen. There is no way to survive!

With our satellites we can target every Arab city in any terrorist nation, and then lock them all into a firing solution. Then at 3am any morning the order was given, every Arab city targeted could be blown clean off the face of the Earth, all at the same time.

We could land our troops 30 minutes later and own the entire nation. There wouldn’t even be anyone left to shoot at our soldiers. The only thing that would be left are giant smoking holes in the sand. Maybe then the other nations would say “ What ever you do don’t piss off the Americans! They can blow away our whole nation with the push of a button, just like they did to those stupid Arabs!” Maybe being “ Dust in the Wind” would stop all stupid BS America bashing. At least to our face, what they to themselves behind our backs doesn’t matter.

2006-08-06 14:55:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If twenty men with box cutters can destroy the world trade centers and cause billions of dollars of damage then imagine what 2K or 20K fanatics could do.

if the US bombed the middle east it would would create a new generation of terrorists faster than they could be killed. Plus it would involve killing millions of innocent people.

Also, the middle east is a huge area - are you going to bomb saudi arabia, egypt, israel, jordan, turkey, iran, iraq and all the others or just some?

It's a simplistic response that would cause horrific damage to the world and horrific suffering.

2006-08-06 14:56:46 · answer #4 · answered by a_blue_grey_mist 7 · 1 0

Well, this is just my point of view. Being half-muslim, I would like you to know that not everyone in the middle east is a terrorist. It is unfortunate that society looks at them that way, but i guess that's just how it is. You have to consider, though, that the US is also looked at in bad ways sometimes, because (in my opinion) we are starting **** with countries that we don't need to. "War" is the US's best option for "peace". However what they need to realize is that using war to have peace is possibly the stupidest thing ever, not to mention an oxy-moron. Do you think terrorists would have attacked this country if we didn't do anything to them? Do you honestly think that they are stupid enough to just start something that big for no reason? Endager their lives, risk their lives for something that they had no background on? Highly unlikely. We have put ourselves in a position that obviously has made them mad, and this is their way of solving it. Just like our way of solving it is to create war. Ridiculous. Not that I don't support our troops, I just think that we're fighting for nothing. Someone has to be the bigger person.

2006-08-07 07:57:05 · answer #5 · answered by Kayla-Ann 3 · 0 0

Why don't I go bomb your house and kill your family? After all you might have something I want! And I don't have to worry about you calling the police then do I? Because I would be living my life with the same philosiphy that you have.

We need to be careful in fighting the terrorists to not become terrorists ourselves.

2006-08-06 14:59:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That is what most people don't understand! Terrorists are the ones who start the fights, then act like they are oppressed victims. I, for one, don't have a shred of sympathy for them. But bombing the hell out of them would cost a lot of money and take too long.

2006-08-06 14:54:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because we would have to bomb all intelligent life out of the Middle East and that would ruin many things. Plus, if just one terrorist makes it out, they will be honor-bound to lay waste to those who had sanctioned the mass murder and we would pay in kind.

Finally, it's just wrong! Get over it already!

2006-08-06 14:55:03 · answer #8 · answered by weirdarchives@prodigy.net 3 · 0 0

because its not like every single person in the Middle East is a terrorist. there are innocent women and children and even men that arent terrorists. anyways everything happening in lebanon has nothing to do with the U.S. if we get invovled then they will jsut turn on us. at least this is my opinion. you ahve a right to your own.

2006-08-06 14:54:16 · answer #9 · answered by ? 2 · 0 0

surely you can't be that naive.....yea sure it sounds so easy for about 3 seconds, until you realize that there are other powerful countries in the world that would bomb the hell out of us. Our country isn't as powerful as many think it is. Our power comes from being allies with other powerful countries and being a part of the United Nations.

2006-08-06 14:54:53 · answer #10 · answered by mhovanes21 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers