i think he has
2006-08-06 14:47:01 · 16 answers · asked by James Harrison 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Depends on the purpose of Bush's foreign policy. If the purpose of the policy was to avoid war, keep us safe, and make everyone like us then, yes he failed measurably.
If the purpose of his foreign police, was to start a holy war, make money for big oil,and make the US population look like a bunch of jackasses then, It was a complete success.
2006-08-06 14:59:20 · answer #1 · answered by marytormeye 4 · 18⤊ 9⤋
You can't fail if you don't write the test. Bush has only ever been concerned with his own view of the US ideal. He does not practise foreign policy, This would require him to enter into a relationship of give and take with another nation, and not act like he holds all the cards. He does have a lot of cards I'll give him that, but most people in the world we agree that he is not playing with a full deck.
2006-08-06 14:55:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Miserably.
What about domestic policy? He has failed as a domestic leader as well.
The handling of the Katrina victims, gas prices, job markets, immigration policies, education, medical care costs, wiretapping, minimum wages, and that's just what I can think of off the top of my head.
Look forward to: changing term limit on Presidential office. Since foreign policy has failed, the Draft.
2006-08-06 15:07:54 · answer #3 · answered by Schona 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One ought to question the muse of your question. If the cornerstone of Bush's overseas coverage on account that 9/11 has been to circumvent or otherwise thwart terrorist attacks at u.s., and if there have been no such attacks, then it truly is troublesome to call the overseas coverage a failure. you may disagree with this coverage, or sense that the cost has been too tremendous, yet, lower than the circumstances, it truly is troublesome to say it truly is a failure. despite the indisputable fact that, I surely ought to consider you otherwise: Condi Rice on the cost ticket could tie McCain inexorably to the Bush administration. A vote for McCain/Rice could heavily resemble a vote for a third Bush time period.
2016-11-23 13:30:37 · answer #4 · answered by springs 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you haven't seen the "massage" you'll love it. Check out this site, or for just the video search on YouTube for Bush and German Chancellor. What a jerk!
http://www.docstrangelove.com/2006/07/17/president-bush-strikes-from-behind/
2006-08-06 14:58:47 · answer #5 · answered by Daphne 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Failed? Of course.
2006-08-06 14:57:05 · answer #6 · answered by Mysterio 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no negotiating with a group of terrorists that have declared war on us. He is the first president to take the needed military action against these animals.
2006-08-06 15:02:07 · answer #7 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What foreign policy, bomb and burn. He is and has been a failure at everything he has done except being a coke snorting, alcoholic. He was good at that.
2006-08-06 14:57:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Foreign and domestic policy and everything else. He's a bumbling idiot who makes America look stupid!
2006-08-06 14:57:57 · answer #9 · answered by Carol R 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you kidding? He has failed at EVERYTHING, even at being a human being. After his term the mother ship will return for him and take him back home where he will be safe.
2006-08-06 14:53:00 · answer #10 · answered by Sherry L 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gee you think? Hell yes. The only thing worse than Bush's foreign policy, is his budget....... or maybe his public speaking..... or his environmental record...... oh hell.... i could go on and on.
2006-08-06 14:54:00 · answer #11 · answered by rummy714 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋