English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Good old Conservatives had nothing else better to do then give WMD's to Saddam who used those same WMD's to kill countless children. Reagan and Bush gave him the loaded weapon to do that.

Bin Laden was armed and trained in weapons and tactics by our government on orders from Reagan and Bush. Again children died at the hands of Bin Laden, the blood is on Reagans and Bush's hands.

Should we even get into the fact Reagan gave arms to Iran. How many baby's killed from Reagan and Bush weapons deals.

Conservatives are smart, when they have a hand at killing baby;s and children they at least wait till their born.

2006-08-06 14:42:04 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

25 answers

You have very good points. You should consider voting for a Libertarian for office or running for office yourself.

Over the years, countless people have died from weapons from conservatives and in their wars. Probably that number is in the millions. But, if the conservatives in our country had not supplied the weapons, somebody else such as China would have done it.

You can not blame Bush and Reagan for all the world's problems. They are only responsible for 99 percent of them.

2006-08-06 14:47:35 · answer #1 · answered by Sparky 2 · 0 2

Bin Laden wasn't trained by the U.S., that's some liberal garbage. Reagan did not give arms to Iran, that comes from the Democratic Party. Sure some people die in war that are innocent but the U.S. always takes care to avoid it and almost all of people that have died as a result of our bombs have so because they were our enemies. Maybe 5% are innocent and no army in history has ever done that.
If you hate the U.S. so much then get out.

2006-08-06 21:56:45 · answer #2 · answered by winger44 1 · 0 0

I would not say millions, thousands maybe, but not millions. You overestimate your numbers. As for Saddam's WMD, the U.S. did not give him the technology for that. I am pretty sure it was the European countries that helped there or maybe the former Soviet Union. The U.S. only gave him conventional weapons. There is a different between conventional and WMD. You may view it the same, but I do not.

2006-08-06 21:52:24 · answer #3 · answered by kepjr100 7 · 0 0

I didn't see anything false in your whole question, or the following statement except that conservatives are not smart, they are the more mentally dimminished of the population, after all they did vote for a coke snorting, alcoholic person for president. To me that wasn't very smart and just look at how it is turning out and that makes them downright Morons.

2006-08-06 21:51:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Ask your abortionist friends. You're about as bad the terrorists that hide behind their children and send them off as suicide bombs.

Maybe you're interested in converting to Islam? Look the Russians are arming Iran! Care to condemn them instead of blaming America first? I'd love to know your sources, also.

2006-08-06 21:49:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Now that you made your political statement about how you dislike or even hate two prior Presidents of the United States. Where is the question? If I understand you right, Conservatives wars kill Babies. Is it true?

The answer is obvious.......... it is False......... ALL WARS KILL BABIES. Not just Conservative Wars.

2006-08-06 21:51:04 · answer #6 · answered by NIck N 5 · 0 0

yeah that is so true. What they do during election time is bring up some sort of moral issue regarding abortion or gay rights in order to try to win the "religious" vote and make people turn their heads on the atrocities that are occuring in the middle east

2006-08-06 21:47:27 · answer #7 · answered by dirty n 1 · 0 0

Ok
Liberals war policy's allowed Hitler to kill SEVERAL millions And we killed alot to in WW2. And then it was a liberal Prez that sent troops to Korea and Vietnam more killings And that's direct action. Not support of another country that turned against us.

2006-08-06 21:56:43 · answer #8 · answered by DaFinger 4 · 0 0

This I think is the most egregious form of hypocrisy by right-wingers. The constantly denounce abortion as a sin and murder, and yet they seem blissfully unaware that their pro-war policies, and their willingness to sell weapons to terrorist cells, when it is advantageous to them, results in the brutal death of children. The same conservative who religiously attends church and decries the culture of death that is embodied by abortion and assisted suicide, has no problems electing into office people who are for the death penalty and for the promotion of the military industrial complex; which turns out not to defend our freedoms as much as increase the sale of high tech weapons for profit, at the expense of innocent lives.

Many conservatives like to tout their supreme devotion to Christ and his teachings. Given the facts mentioned above, I wonder what Jesus would say if he came back today. I think he would say: “Many will tell me in that day,'Lord, Lord, didn't we prophesy in your name, in your name cast out demons, and in your name do many mighty works?' Then I will tell them,'I never knew you. Depart from me, you who work iniquity.'” (Matthew &;22-23)

2006-08-06 22:02:05 · answer #9 · answered by Lawrence Louis 7 · 0 0

Kill one person. Over the course of a million years, how many children would that person have had? how many children would his children have had?

But you know something can't really die until it has been alive. So in my example, I think only one person has died.

Oh, and don't actually go and kill one person.

2006-08-06 21:48:25 · answer #10 · answered by badgerlicious03 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers