Oceania(NATO) fought two wars against the Communists in East Asia(Red China) and Eurasia(U.S.S.R.) it really wouldn't make sense that Oceania would be Communist for propaganda purposes, were they perhaps Facist like Hitler's National Socialist Party? Thoughts?
2006-08-06
14:25:42
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Black Sabbath
6
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Obviously.. What Sub-Type..
2006-08-06
14:31:34 ·
update #1
Totalitarianism is such a broad governmental structure, be more specific.. That's like saying that there are no differences between Facism and Communism..
2006-08-06
14:35:46 ·
update #2
Thank you for that utter failure at attempting to answer my question and ending up plugging propaganda.
2006-08-06
14:41:31 ·
update #3
I guess that could be plausable, however all the Facist players in the 30's and 40's signed the Anti-Comintern Pact which is a symbolic gesture of solidarity, and the U.S.S.R. provided arms to nearly every communist upstart group including Republican Spain also showing solidarity to a degree. That being said you are correct about the Sino-Soviet border disputes and Franco didn't exactly do everything Hitler told him to.
2006-08-06
16:08:40 ·
update #4