Not that you give up one or the other to in 21st Century America, but if you had to, would you rather be treated as a true peer of men, or would you rather have the niceties that being a female gets you, such as a greater presumption of innocence, having people rush to your aid when you appear to be in a conflict, being able to be "in your face" to a man w/o fear of reciprocation, free drinks, favorable treatment in family court, etc, etc, etc.
http://podcasts.yahoo.com/series?s=27e528574aefebea78a0729401575219
2006-08-06 10:45:39 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
babs- one word: "HUH?"
2006-08-06 15:27:12 · update #1
I prefer deferential treatment. Equal rights are for ballbusters. I do not feel inferior to a man; rather, I complement him as he respects my role and me.
2006-08-06 16:29:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Smiles wickedly, is there such a thing as equal rights? Oh, the possibilities of deferential treatment... sheer ecstasy!
2006-08-06 17:57:37 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For some reason, most think they should have both. The want the man to pay and do the work yet still want the benefits of being a female.
2006-08-06 17:50:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Equality. The other behaviors you put up in contrast are in fact some of the rewards of being equal and respected on your own merits. It's a non sequitur.
2006-08-06 22:18:25 · answer #4 · answered by Babs 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would rather have equal rights.
2006-08-06 17:49:39 · answer #5 · answered by grinningleaf 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Equality all the way.
2006-08-06 21:23:59 · answer #6 · answered by Girl Wonder 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋