English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

now we could have all of our people out of that place which is having tuns of pounds of bombs drooped on it every day if we deafened that airport all our people would be out but our week president didn't defend it from Israel now Americans are still trapped there is that wrong i say yes what say you?

2006-08-06 10:10:13 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

to john j no one cares

2006-08-06 10:37:04 · update #1

to rukidding our citizen being left in a war zone is never admirable

2006-08-06 10:37:58 · update #2

Carol O who are these arabs and our army would be more then cababel of protacting it

2006-08-06 10:38:51 · update #3

okay i have bad spelling its okay you know what i mean

2006-08-06 10:39:16 · update #4

6 answers

yes

2006-08-06 10:15:38 · answer #1 · answered by Mag 7 · 1 0

We wouldn't have had to defend the airport from the Israelis, we would have had to defend it from the Arabs. If we'd told the Israelis, "Hey, we're taking our people out of the country between 6 AM on Tuesday and 8 PM on Wednesday," the Israelis wouldn't have bombed it during those hours. The Arabs, however, would have killed every American that got within 10 miles of the place.

2006-08-06 10:24:00 · answer #2 · answered by CarolO 7 · 1 0

Pakistan has the right to and we in easy words can wager even if or not they have the brains no longer to. If the U. S. receives Bin Ladin interior Pakistan without their permission they could condemn the U. S. all they want, keep face with the islamists and be rid of a discomfort-in-the-butt religious radical terrorist all in a unmarried shot. it truly is a political bonanza because the individuals are too dumb to no longer save sending them money besides. Obama will invade Pakistan and then compassionately comprehend the abject poverty in that cesspool of a rustic and rationalize sending them money to assist the adverse which they are going to right now turn over to the military.

2016-11-23 13:14:02 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The Us "dose" have the right to ...I'm sorry...I can't stop laughing enough to "right" the response...what the F is a "tun"...I'm sure most airports are "deaf" just because of the noise levels...President Bush has been in office for 6 years, not a "week"...Jesus F'in Christ!

Edit: I thought you cared, buck-o, otherwise why ask the question? Should we call you a wahmbulance?

2006-08-06 10:23:18 · answer #4 · answered by johngjordan 3 · 1 0

It says that Americans shouldn't have been in that area since they were warned by the State Department that it was a dangerous and that they chose to take the chance and now we have to risk service people's lives to get them out. I think what the U.S. government is admirable considering those people shouldn't have gone in the first place. They went at their own risk.

2006-08-06 10:23:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

They shouldn't be there in the first place!

America can't defend every idiot everywhere! and shouldn't!

If a stupid fool went to Antartica and got stuck should we have spend millions to go them? NOT!!!!

2006-08-06 21:40:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers