English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

The water would boil really quickly at 30,000 feet, but it wouldn't boil at 212 F or 100 C - its boiling point would be much lower. The water wouldn't get very hot, so your egg wouldn't "cook."

2006-08-06 10:12:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

The water would boil at a much lower temperature on Mt Everest because of the reduced air pressure. Since it boils at a lower temperature, it would boil quicker, but the water would be a lot cooler. Therefore a 3minute egg on Mt Everest would still be basically raw while a 3minute egg a the sea shore (or store) would be considered edible.

(This all assumes the hypothetical location on Mt Everest is protected from the wind and sub-zero temperatures and the egg is not frozen from the journey.)

2006-08-06 17:13:00 · answer #2 · answered by idiot detector 6 · 0 0

It'll take the same time boiling. Although water will take longer to boil at Mt. Everest

2006-08-06 17:09:01 · answer #3 · answered by da_hammerhead 6 · 0 0

Mt Everest.

You have to get the fire started at Mt Everest, and there's a burner ready at the sea store.

2006-08-06 17:07:57 · answer #4 · answered by Professor Campos 3 · 0 0

I'll say Mt. Everest - only because baking recipes call for longer cook times at high altitude.
Am I right???

2006-08-06 17:08:52 · answer #5 · answered by peachiegirl 2 · 0 0

It takes longer to boil water at sea leve because the vapor pressure is lower then the air pressure.

2006-08-06 17:08:08 · answer #6 · answered by PlatinumWeirdo 2 · 0 0

Good question....
A lack of oxygene or too much wind...... My bet is that it takes longer on the Everest, because at the sea shore you can make a windshield to protect the fire.

2006-08-06 17:08:04 · answer #7 · answered by Bloed 6 · 0 0

If you were to put the egg into the water that had already reached the boining point, there would be no time difference. If you started with water at ambient temp, it would take longer at altitude.(on top of Mt. )

2006-08-06 17:10:25 · answer #8 · answered by cherokeeflyer 6 · 0 0

theoretically, it would be faster on mount Everest, because air pressure is lower, but the temperatures and the storms would make almost impossible to light fire to boil the water.

2006-08-06 21:38:13 · answer #9 · answered by ignacio a 2 · 0 0

If the heat applied is constant, both will boil at the same given time.

2006-08-06 17:12:45 · answer #10 · answered by Celestine N 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers