Speak No Evil?

Question

One should keep close their fears and concerns and seek not remediation.
To do so incurs the wrath of the listener and heightens the level of frustration.
To convey an idea in it’s proper context in the course of a conversation .
Is difficult to do and renders untrue your words through aberration.
Any perceived slight or slip of the tongue will be met with undue trepidation.
How does one guard the words that they use to avoid this type of vexation?
To try and seek clarity when expressing oneself through the act of communication.
Is to leave oneself open to misunderstanding and unwarranted incrimination.
While it seems clear the motives were pure in seeking dissemination.
What is it’s worth when all the times spent in offering rectification?
Singularity of thought and purposeful speech precludes any recantation.
Consider long your desire to hold in your mind the essence of clarification.
The onus of the burden resides with you if you truly wish edification.
But be warned in advance there’s a price to be paid and it’s usually vilification.

The question is, how does one properly phrase a question that elicits a thoughtful response without raising the ire of the respondents. Is there a tried and true method of asking that causes someone to answer in a truthful and logical manner?

Answer 1

You speak as clear as water to me me mate. I see most clearly where you are coming from. One thing you could possibly do is to ask wishfully, leaving aside overtones of religion and culture, though this is no warranty you will get the message across, for many a man would get offended just because of the content or meaning your words refer to, and not because of the way you put a question over to them. If you do not believe me, just try to comment on religion, however politely you should, to a fundamentalist and see what happens. I am with you in this.

Answer 2

Clear as mud:

"To try and seek clarity when expressing oneself through the act of communication. Is to leave oneself open to misunderstanding and unwarranted incrimination."

Answer 3

what the hell is the question?