People trash on Bush. Could YOU do his job?

Question

Well? Are you 'all that' and a bag of chips, or what? Pick one issue and explain how your approach would be better than what Bush has done etc...

What issue do you think you could handle better than he has?

Even our 'ivy-leaguer' didn't read the entire question! ROTF

What's up with copying me, thomas? Can't well think up an opinion of your own? LOL

Answer 1

Oh, yes. And yes.

Environmental policy. I would have ratified the Kyoto Protocol, just for starters. Wouldn't have gutted the EPA. Wouldn't be still whistling through the graveyard on the subject of global warming.

Then there's Iraq. Wouldn't be there. Enough said.

Answer 2

These items were from your other post:

Iraq-Total BS we shouldn't be there but Uncle Dick had to stuff his pockets with cash. Fire Uncle Dick but then who would run the country for him.

Budget deficit-See G BUsh Sr. "voodoo economics" describing Ronald Reagan economic policies when he ran against him. Jr's hero.

Illegal immigration-Close the borders stop giving cheap labor to all his contributors.

Energy- Have his Attorney Genral investigate something important for once like oil company profits.

North Korea- Sit down and talk either put up or shut up. The N. Koreans laughed right in his face with their missle tests.

Employment-Pass a livable raise instead of screwing people over with no minium raise so people could get off welfare and get back on their feet the working poor could pay taxes instead of living off the goverment. NAFTA was a big mistake and their are many unemployed Americans because all the manufacturing was sent over seas or across the border. Clinton's fault all the way on that one so do something good and turn that mess around.

Answer 3

People trash on Bush? Hmm.. I would check the syntax of that sentence, ittle boy. I wonder why people trash on Bush and his supporters? Your question is really the best answer. Because he is an ignorant baffoon.

Yes, Absolutely, resolutely, yes, without a doubt. I could do his job and do it better. You see, I got into an graduated from TWO Ivy league schools unlike our so called President who was a "D" student and was let into Yale because his and his daddy's daddy went there.

I have two Master's Degrees. The President?????The worst educational resume for any President in modern history.

Answer 4

Good, question
yes.

That is the whole point that at time voters from your party overlooked while choosing this canidate.

He came off as a simpleton, lacking intellectual curoisty or capasity.

Your side argued that as long as he had great advisors he would do a great job.

That is how you guys justified him.

We believe that you need brains to run a country, that your advisors should be equals not crutches.

If your party is right then i can be president too as long as i have some crutche...i mean advisors.

thanks.

Answer 5

I'll take the easy one... SPEECH READING....how I know I will be better, because I'm good at it. I have acted in several plays, meaning I have read words, remembered words, and recited words without ANY difficulty. I have YET to see this man go through ONE SPEECH without wrong inflection on a word, using poor vocabulary, or without stumbling along while using a prompter. Heaven forbids if the man ad-libs. Granted, its not the core of being president, it has nothing to do with laws, politics, or even leadership in any way shape or form, but if he was better at giving speeches, we all wouldn't know he's the idiot he is, would we????

Answer 6

a infant could do what the president of the new age does. There is no skill in being a president like there was in the past. Past presidents didn't have all these political moguls pulling the strings or corrupting our government like these presidents have. Past presidents called the shots and everyone else listened. Im talking presidents from the 1700s-1900's

Answer 7

This is what you get when you elect a president with 30 IQ

Bush is not fit to be a world leader.

Anybody approach would be better than Bush.

Answer 8

Since I can speak and read better than him....I do think I could do a better job.

Instead of picking one issue to explain what I could do better.....I'll just say that I would choose a better group of people to tell me what to do. I probably would've kept Colin Powell around (one example) and listened to him instead of Rusmfeld.

It's not George that is doing a bad job....he's too stupid to even do that. It's his administration of hawkish neocons.

Answer 9

I wouldn't have made up a bunch of lies to attack a country that had nothing to do with 9/11

I wouldn't have given the rich 2 tax-cuts when Dennis Stockman and Ronald Reagan already proved "Trickle down economics" doesn't work!

I would not have signed 807 slips saying I was not going by the law.

I would have never tried to claim that "DETAINEES" weren't entitled to be tried, and were protected by the Geneva Convention!

I would not have cut the Veterans Affairs budget this year, and flat-line it for the past 5 years!

If I were to attack Iraq, it would have been the way it was done in Operation Desert Fox!

"Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Henry H. Shelton echoed Cohen's assessment. "I am confident that the carefully planned and superbly executed combat operations of the past four days have degraded Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction [WMD] programs, his ability to deliver weapons, and his ability to militarily threaten the security of this strategically important Persian Gulf region," Shelton told reporters. The JCS chairman said the U.S. combatant commander responsible for the planning and execution of the aerial assault, Gen. Anthony C. Zinni, commander in chief of the U.S. Central Command, was of the same opinion.

There were no U.S. or British combat casualties or aircraft losses--an exceptional achievement, in Zinni's view. "Even in peacetime, exercises of this scale can be dangerous and can be very, very trying; to do this without any casualties in the environment our forces faced was truly remarkable," Zinni said at a 21 December Pentagon press briefing.

More than 300 U.S. and British war-planes, spearheaded by U.S. Navy and Marine Corps squadrons operating at night from the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS Enterprise during initial missions on 16 December, flew over 650 strike and strike-support sorties against approximately 100 Iraqi military and military-related targets. Ten ships of the U.S. Fifth Fleet launched more than 325 Tomahawk cruise missiles, bolstered with an additional punch from more than 90 cruise missiles launched from U.S. Air Force B-52 bombers. Thousands of U.S. ground troops, augmented by hundreds of special operations forces, also were deployed to protect Kuwait or to carry out other unspecified missions.

"The forces participating in Operation Desert Fox clearly demonstrated their skill, their professionalism, and their dedication," Shelton said. "It was one team and one fight," he added"

http://www.navyleague.org/seapower/operation_desert_fox.htm

I would have tried to capture Osama!!

"So I don't know where he is. You know, I just don't spend that much time on him... We haven't heard much from him. And I wouldn't necessarily say he's at the center of any command structure. And, again, I don't know where he is. I- I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him."
—Bush, answering a question about Osama bin Laden at a March 13, 2002 news conference.

Answer 10

You put too much faith in George Bush's ability to do anything presidential.
Cheny, Rice, and Rumsfeld run this country while Bush plays with his GameBoy all day and every day.
Come on...you already knew that, didn't ya?
Of course you did!!!