talk against Irans nuclear programs?
most ppl here say if Iran makes a bomb they will use it, so whats the big deal the US has used it before nothing new?
2006-08-06
09:09:32
·
19 answers
·
asked by
nicky
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
ppl,didn't actually the Us wipe Japan of?
and didn'the ones who used it know what the effect is going to be?if it was bad why does the US still keep making more bombs?
and sth else these conflicts about Irans nuclear program started at Khatamis time and no talkes of wipping Israel was made at his time.
the enrichment of uraniam needs to be more than90%for making bombs while Iran sayes it will keep it only 3%and the ppl of the nuclear agency are able to check that when ever they want,and as far as they have cheked Irans sites, the reactores that they have is not able to make bombs?
2006-08-06
09:25:56 ·
update #1
using bombs to save lives ,what a stuid statment!
DO YOU KNOW HOW MANT INOCENT PPL THAT STUPIB THING KILLED ,THE EFECT OF THAT BOMB STILL MAKES CHILDREN TO BE BORN ILL.
2006-08-06
09:29:16 ·
update #2
You lack the perspective to understand this. While the United States has had nuclear weapons since 1944, it has not used them other than to end World War II with Japan (Germany had already surrendered.)
You need to understand that by using the bombs the US actually saved thousands of lives on both sides of the conflict because Japan (which wanted to take over the world) simply would not surrender. If the USA had not used the bombs the war would have gone on for years, killing many more people.
The USA did not drop the bomb on Tokyo or a very large city but on small cities after warnings.
Since then despite being involved in more than a dozen wars, the USA has not used any of its nuclear or chemical weapons. Compare that with Saddam, who used nerve gas on the Kurds and killed many of his own people.
The USA has the capacity to humanely use weapons.
2006-08-06 09:16:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sir J 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
We used atomic weapons to put an end to WWII. Unbelievably it took two of them to do the job. That's the kind of enemy we were up against. You might want to check into how many American lives were lost in that war. We had a way to stop the war and we used it. It wasn't an easy decision by the way. Now Iran is a country that wants to start wars and not stop them. We don't want unstable countries with idiots in power to have access to this technology because they will use it to literally destroy Israel. Here in the U.S. it requires quite a few OKs to get the go ahead to make a nuclear strike against another country. In Iran I'm assuming that it would only take one person and a trigger. The scientists that developed the A-Bomb didn't want to do it but they new what the consequences would be if Germany got one first. They chose the lesser of evils. It should be obvious that we don't want to use our own huge stockpile of nuclear weapons. We have them as a deterrent not as a means of fighting war. A-Bombs are bad for everyone. Just be thankful that it is mostly the more responsible countries that have them. We don't want some retard from Iran to have one. It would be a huge threat to peace. It would probably be a guarantee to an end of peace.
Here is YOUR ANSWER. Do you really think we have a better reason for Iran to not have a nuclear weapon? Here is what you said. BTW learn how to spell.
"using bombs to save lives ,what a stuid statment!
DO YOU KNOW HOW MANT INOCENT PPL THAT STUPIB THING KILLED ,THE EFECT OF THAT BOMB STILL MAKES CHILDREN TO BE BORN ILL."
The U.S.A and China and Russia and others tried to work out a deal with Iran so that they could have access to the technology of creating electricity using nuclear reactors. The deal wasn't good enough for Iran and they rejected the offer. To me it was proof that they are not being honest in what they say their goals are for nuclear technology. If they get enough centrifuges going they could develop weapons grade plutunium. We seriously would have liked to build a relationship with Iran but it's not our fault that they are stupid.
2006-08-06 09:26:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. Japan exploded their atomic bomb 6 days after Hiroshima!
2. Japan had plans to put it on a sub and bomb the US!
3.Japan had subs that carried bombers and would bomb the US!
4. We invented this tech first, it's ours not Irans!
5.Iran states they want electicity, not bombs!
6. There 2 kinds of power plants one makes bombs possible!
7 The other doesn't and it's cheaper to build!
8. Nuclear bombs are antiques, we MOABs!
9. MOABs are 22,000lb coventional bombs, NO radiation!
10. The reason for Nuclear bombs is to poison the enemys land!
11. Nuclear bomb use is now beyond haneous, it's criminal!
12. Iran is clearly looking to do something criminal!
13. By stealing our tech they are already criminals, they're thieves!
14. Iran is going to get blown off the map if they continue !
2006-08-06 10:17:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
When America used this weapon, it was in a time, when we didn't really know the implications, I am not using that as an excuse, but it is the truth. Since then the world community has pretty much decided that a super power which has such weapons, should be responsible for its use. And if you will note, the US and all other nuclear superpowers have kept from using the weapon. Iran and North Korea have no self restrictions. They see the weapon as "if we have it, we use it". They will not hold back from the use, when they threaten to use it, they will. It isn't such a concern if the nation who holds nuclear power uses it responsibly, the world in general can't trust Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Syria, Lebanon, and other like minded countries to have nuclear power, and use it responsibly.
2006-08-06 09:19:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by asmul8ed 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
A lot of people have Nukes. Anyone who has them would be stupid to use them if they could. They would be blown off of the face of the earth and they know it!
There is nothing illegal about Iran's nuclear program, as long as it isn't using them to manufacture a bomb>
My question is why England is sending nuclear material to the Iran military with the approval of Great Britain! They got caught, but how can they even think about doing this, unless they are just trying to set them up!
2006-08-06 09:18:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ashley to make a girl squirt it has nothing to do with a g spot and small you have to rub around with a picture of and around the area I'm not to keep running and running and running and running the pressure builds up and it's purpose out there's no urine at all vaginal juice it all comes down to around the entrance or close to the entrance of vaginamost women don't know they Spur until guys tell them because they think Assist Witness but there's a third G-spot you have to touch which is near the entrance of vagina that you rub in the pressure builds up in squirts outI've made many girls squirt does of never squirted before and that's what I do
2016-03-27 01:18:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The US used it in self defense. We were attacked--uprovoked--by a nation that was negotiating with us at the time. We lost many fine young men, needlessly, and we weren't about to drag on the war any longer than necessary.
Iran on the otherhand, has stated that another nation should be wiped off the map. Do you see the difference?
2006-08-06 09:15:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by amish-robot 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The U.S. knows what it's like to be a nuclear power, so it has the authority to state the conditions for nuclear weapon possession. The U.S. is the only country ever to use atomic weapons during warfare, so we have the experience necessary to understand what that means. No other country can claim this, nor can any other country know what it is like to live with it.
2006-08-06 09:19:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iran wants them so they can terrorize the world with them. We have them and so do others, but they are for defense only. You need to study your history of Nagasaki and Hiroshima before you make silly statements about our use. We used those bombs to save lives. If you knew your history you would know that.
2006-08-06 09:14:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, I think that the world saw what the effects of the nuclear bombs were, and realized that, for the sake of decency, that they shouldn't be used again. Just because one person robs a liquor store, doesn't mean everyone should have a right to rob a liquor store.
2006-08-06 09:14:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Kung Fu Taco 2
·
0⤊
0⤋