Aquittal aside...Innocent or guilty of molesting kids? Will he ever be relevant again or is doomed to be a side show attraction?
2006-08-06 08:55:09 · 46 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
GUILTY!!!
2006-08-06 08:57:04 · answer #1 · answered by hpluver4ever 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I like some of his music, but dislike the person.
Sometimes good music can be created by bad people.
I don't know what exactly he is or isn't guilty off, but the way he messed about with his face and looks just shows how much of a freak he is, and an idiot. So it is easy to also believe that his lifestyle is also like a freak, with him fancying kids or whatever. Other people who I have met who are strange, are usually strange in more ways than one.
2006-08-06 09:03:21 · answer #2 · answered by MARTIN B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he's innocent. Have you ever seen the kid's mother talk? The way she words everything makes her sound selfish and like she only wants money. She almost never mentions the harm it could have done to her son if he was molested, but she constantly brings up the fact that she deserves money. Ugh.
Plus, the man made Thriller. He can do no wrong.
2006-08-06 09:00:40 · answer #3 · answered by Not Allie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sad, but he is doomed forever as a side show attraction, a weird person, a guilty person, and a has been super star.
2006-08-06 09:02:43 · answer #4 · answered by Zeta 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What makes it worse is that given the fact he has a previous recorded parents still allowed there children to go at weekends.
Children can be bought through out the world why did he need these. He is high profile and worth millions to the media. If its true perhaps he needed their consent. If a lie why can he only relate to children is it true that money cannot by true friendship.Through the honesty and purity from children in his eyes he is good because he makes them smile.
2006-08-06 09:08:15 · answer #5 · answered by froggerty 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Michael Jackson a child molester...and a ugly broken nose side show attraction...
2006-08-06 09:06:58 · answer #6 · answered by gengen 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is doomed to be a side show attraction.
He was at the height of his career with "Thriller" and then
in the beginning of the 1990s with
"Black or White".
He reminds me a little bit of Howard Hughes.
2006-08-06 09:01:06 · answer #7 · answered by tjhauck2001 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
AS how i feel about the little freak, i always have never like the freak,even when helooked human,i will never let my kids around him so you can bet where i stand,HE IS GUILTY,just has too much money to buy people (kids)
2006-08-06 09:00:45 · answer #8 · answered by Clydesdale 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wasn't there, so I wouldn't actually be able to say ~~ however, I believe that he is GUILTY!! No grown man hangs out with little boys.. that's bull........he was/is a pedophile and a child molester(of boys)..
2006-08-06 09:08:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He's finished here in the states. We all know he did it and continued to do it. How does it work where he lives now? I'm sure he picked a place where he wouldn't have to worry. His ex is probably getting custody of their kids back.
2006-08-06 09:02:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even if he never molested kids (im sure he did) but by his looks he would still be a sideshow attraction!
2006-08-06 08:57:54 · answer #11 · answered by Sad Mom 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋