First il say this...WE ARE NOT LOOSING THE WAR!, What happened in Nam is happening agan the Iraqi war. Alot(Not all) of Democrats and Liberals have been using the media to try and get Americans to think were just over there killing civillians and that were loosing..WE ARE NOT..Civillians die because of the enemy strapping bombs to themselves blowing themselves up in public areas..We havnt lost a major battle in Iraq, and they will be ready to self Govern and conctrol themselves by the end of the year so America will be able to leave..WE ARE WINNING, its a landside victory..
Second, Liberals are trying to get the Defense and War budget down so they can give it to the lazy people in America on wellfare, and if we do pullout, Civil War will happen in Iraq and Terrorism will be worse than ever because these Towelheads will think we run away from war.
2006-08-06 08:01:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by DC D 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iraq was BS from the beginning. Remember East Timor? Of course not. The genocide went on for years and the US of A did nothing. You know why? There was no vested interest there. No money to be made. So the media made it disappear. Iraq was about the oil pure and simple it had nothing to about terrorists it had to do with money. Keep repeating the propaganda god forbid you do any research on propaganda because you might learn the truth about your brave leaders. You can tell your grandchildren you helped bring this country down because you were afraid to even make an effort at finding the truth.
2006-08-06 08:04:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Thomas S 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's much more complex than that.
Liberals AND conservatives both want to get out of Iraq. It's not because we are losing the war it's because they no longer believe it's OUR war. Iraq needs to learn to stand on it's own and the rest of the world needs to help out.
Liberals spoke out first because they have our civil liberties in mind. Bush tried to take them away .. and succeeded in doing so in many ways.
Civil liberties are what set us apart from the rest of the world.
2006-08-06 07:58:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lee S 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
We won the war in in Iraq. Our armed forces successfully invaded it and overthrew Saddam. Bush said this when he landed on the carrier and said major combat operations were over. Remember "Mission Accomplished" ? What we are now is an occupying army and all occupations come to an end.
2006-08-06 08:01:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by ggarsk 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Their not weak on terrorist,,they want to make sure they are after the real terrorist,and not some made up target,to get ill gain popularity with the public..
Bush has no ideal how to stop terrorist,but he had to start a war to look good,,
Yeah He's looking good now.
Especially with Innocent blood on his hands
.
2006-08-06 08:05:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Flat s 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have not met any Americans yet that don`t want to stop terrorism. Besides don`t forget 911 happened on Juniors watch even if you think Clinton let Bin Laden go why did Bush not get STRONG and go after him as soon as he got in office. Oh it is not a war it is a occupation
2006-08-06 08:00:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you need to be better informed. When the US becomes the terrorist it's time to stop.
Are you not reading the headlines about the US soldiers who are over there murdering people?
2006-08-06 07:57:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Justsyd 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
and you spotted that the guidelines weren't utilized to individuals until Obama grew to alter into president.so a procedures as i understand once you seize human beings in time of conflict, they are detained in camps until the tip of hostilities. it particularly is treating terrorists greater helpful than they deserve. confident i understand, and the guy admitted to creating plans a terrorist attack on the U. S., and in case you're taking a seem at historic previous individuals captured combating for yet another united states of america against the U. S. have been tried for treason and finished. Abdul (as he now calls himself) is being taken care of lots greater helpful than he merits.
2016-12-11 04:03:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by binford 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They haven't done squat about terrorism. When old clinton was in charge all he did was sit in his big white house and get BJs from a fat groupie.
2006-08-06 08:01:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Boredstiff 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think they are very weak. I have noticed when confronting a damnocrat that they tend to turn YELLOW and run the other way.
2006-08-06 07:57:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋