hmm.. tough question!?!?!?

Question

Question 1:
If you knew a woman who was pregnant, who had 8 kids already, three who were deaf, two who were blind, one mentally retarded, and she had syphilis, would you recommend that she have an abortion?


Question 2:

It is time to elect a new world leader, and only your vote counts.
Here are the facts about the three candidates.

Candidate A
Associates with crooked politicians, and consults with
astrologists. He's had two istresses. He also chain smokes and drinks 8 to 10 martinis a day.

Candidate B
He was kicked out of office twice, sleeps until noon, used opium in college and drinks a quart of whiskey every evening.

Candidate C
He is a decorated war hero. He's a vegetarian, doesn't smoke,
drinks an occasional beer and never cheated on his wife.

Which of these candidates would be your choice?

Answer 1

Question 1....yes, i would recommend an abortion...some people simply should not reproduce....

Question 2...I would vote for Candidate C...sounds like a decent person...but all politicians have some issues....

Answer 2

Question one. Would that lady be really pregnant if she had all those problems. Who would want to sleep with her in the first place.

Question 2: Prolly candidate A. B is just lazy. C is a big liar never cheated on his wife right. A, who isn't a crooked politicians.

Answer 3

Question 1: that is NOT up to me..i have NO BUSINESS telling anyone else what they should or should not do about a pregnancy. and WHAT IF the child was perfectly okay? (on a personal note, i could never have an abortion..a mother's love sees through the disability *mother of 3*)

Question 2: vote myself as the new world leader....if my vote is the only one that counts...why shouldn't I be running things??

Answer 4

For Question 1 I would have 2 say no. Abortion is never a good thing!!!
For Question 2 I would choose Candidate C.

Answer 5

Question 1:
NO, Abortion is wrong.....not to mention you'de be aborting Beethoven.

and Question 2:

Well...Candidate A is Franklin D. Roosevelt

Candidate B is Winston Churchill

and Canidate C is Adolf Hitler....So I wouldn't vote.

Answer 6

question 1: give the baby up 4 adoption instead
question 2: C becuz he sounds like the best person

oh, C is hitler?! he wasn't a war hero stupid! r u crazy?! so i'd pick one of the other ones
and for question 1 i would say keep the child instead becuz it's beethoven. u tried to trick me!

Answer 7

To question #1...NO, NO, NO! That's like saying children with deformities are worthless!

To question #2...candidate C

Answer 8

Q1- No.How sad...god,that girl must be dumb.Put it up for adoption.
Q2- Candidate C.I luff vegetarians...and people who dont smoke...or never cheated on anyone...lol.

That was kind of a weird question you gave there.

Answer 9

If any of the above candidates claim they never cheated on their wife, I don't know if I would believe it. Most politicians are liars (naturally). It's more simple for them to lie than it is for them to brush their own teeth! So I vote for NONE of the above, especially if one of them is supposed to be John Kerry, I really loathe the ground he walks on and the air he breathes.

If it were left to me, I would choose the Candidate who I believe had the most aggressive stance on protecting this country and our citizens, certainly NOT some flip flopping bozo who would want to have the approval of the UN to take action to defend our country, EVERY war in the United States was started by a Democrat NOT by Republicans, the Republicans do something to defend this country and suddenly THEY are the target for everyone callling Republicans war mongers and terrible people? Read American history, all previous acts of war in which the United States participated were started by Democrats! Now when the stakes are the highest, for America's future...they claim they do not want to be at war?

We are currently in WWIII, they just have not used those words yet. So consider, do you want a weakling who is not even able to make up his mind without the approval of a group of people who don't care about America or Democracy! OR do you want to have a man in office that will at least try to fight and show some kind of presence on behalf of our country's stand in the battle against terror, I am so surprised that so many people just do not get it!

The current situation in the world demands a man who is not so worried about how "politically correct" our terror stricken country can be while trying to stop future attacks like that which happened Sept. 11, 2001. When you ask questions like this don't you remember the people who were jumping from the Twin Towers to their death because they were burning and suffocating? Don't you think at all?! What do you think is going to happen if we sit on our hands and just say, "Shame shame on you for attacking us, the UN may not approve!" Talk to some of the families who watched their loved ones die that day (innocent unarmed civilians) who were only going to work, or about their regular business, then tell me that you think that WAS something that we want to happen again and again in this country? Can you stand it, when they come into an elementary school as they did in Russia? Can you stand to see bits and pieces of children blown up all over an American Elementary School's Gym? How much abuse do you think America and Americans should take and how many attacks and who in your family has to die as a result of one of these attacks before you begin to get offa your politically correct butts and either become an Enemy of the United States OR join good Americans in their battle, to try to avoid more attacks. The enemy only wants us to say we surrender, so do YOU surrender? I know I won't surrender to them, and God help you when you do, because I will probably have more than one opportunity to watch them hack saw your head off on the evening news while I am trying to have my dinner.

Wise up. This is a life OR death situation. Innocent people died that day, do you think their deaths and that attack should count for nothing? You know who I think I will vote for??? The Candidate that supports fighting terror! That's who...and I am a voting American, as are many many others who know the truth about what is really happening and the TRUTH that if we do not have the guts to defend out country, then we will be a much easier target.

Oh and in case you have me mistaken for an angry Republican in regards to question one, after her first baby, she should have been sterilized. One baby from a woman afflicted with syphilis that cannot even take care of herself, is even too much! To allow this person to keep giving birth to special needs children *(possibly because of her own disease?) I think it should be criminal, if her worthless tail was in jail, she would have more difficulty getting re-infected or knocked up again (not that either would be impossible, but it would be less likely). Yes to the abortion, and perhaps if she has a contagious disease or advanced syphilis then she should be locked up for the sake of those that she may infect or afflict with her careless sexual practices.

Answer 10

question number one: yeah, right

question three: none of the above . . I would write someone in