English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-06 04:55:41 · 14 answers · asked by RepublicansAreFookingRetards 1 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

14 answers

I looked at your Q&A. What I see is that you are hateful. You give every other American a bad name.
No, he should not be tried for treason any more than FDR should have been for not doing anything about the reports that the Japanese were planning an attack.
I'm sorry that you have no common sense. I'm sorry that you don't seem to realize that if Bush is to blame, so are the foreign and domestic policies of everyone from Eisenhower forward. This includes Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Bush 41, Clinton, and Bush 43. Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon's foreign policies weakened our military. Carter did nothing to stop the escalating terrorist attacks. Same with Reagan and Bush 41. Clinton was too busy getting laid and becoming involved in civil wars that had nothing to do with us (Bosnia, anyone?) to be bothered. Now Bush 43 gets stuck with all of it.
You have a right to disagree with him and his policies. Many soldiers have bled and died to give you that right. However, the least you could do is allow your opinions to be decided based upon reason.
One could surmise from your Q&A and this question that you have a lot of growing up to do.
What could President Bush have done to prevent 9/11? Shut down all airports? He had eight months to prevent it. Clinton had eight years. Bush 41 had four. Reagan had four years. Carter had four years.
They're all to blame. Even your precious Democrats.

2006-08-06 05:13:29 · answer #1 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 0 0

Democrat or Republican it makes no difference.
Most people cannot imagine the lengths the ruling elites will go to, to increase their power, money, and control.

Dubya's puppeteers policies are not new :-

“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Nuremberg Trials

The US. Government has lied about many wars. The increase of troops in Vietnam was based on an attack in the Tonkin Gulf that never happened. Some say that Roosevelt knew about Pearl Harbor and let it happen to get support to join World War Two. The Spanish-American War (Remember the Maine!) was also based on a hoax.
Not to mention the numerous covert wars that they lied about. Iran-Contra, the overthrow of Mossadegh in Iran, Allende in Chile, Arbenz in Guatemala. Also the war in Panama, against someone who was on the payroll of the CIA. Cuba as well. The Bay of Pigs invasion was supported by the CIA, and the people who invaded were trained by the CIA in Guatemala.

As for 9/11 this is the origin of the plan:-
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the Untied Nations Business Council in September 1994

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)

And this is what Dubya's puppeteers had to say in 2000;-
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)


Which brings into question 9/11/(2001), which was never investigated properly, and has been hijacked in order to enact Dubya's agenda and the subsequent illegitimate wars.
The 9/11 documentary Loose Change 2nd edition is available free on Youtube:-

Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGEb40o17yE&search=loose%20change%202nd%20edition

Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOVWBQKUpsU&search=loose%20change%202nd%20edition

Part 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtV1uxYnu0w&search=loose%20change%202nd%20edition

Decide for yourselves people ;)


I do agree with Dubya on one thing:-

"I think one way for us to end up being viewed as the ugly American is for us to go around the world saying, "We do it this way. So should you."
"I think the United States must be humble and must be proud and confident of our values, but humble in how we treat nations that are figuring out how to chart their own course."
George W. Bush - 2nd presidential debate Oct 11th 2000

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page=1

2006-08-06 05:04:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

God isn't inflicting miscarriages. If i kill my 10 year previous and broke the newborn's physique into products and sucked it up with a vacuum cleanser... you could call me a psycho and that i could be on Nancy Grace for the subsequent 13 months. what's so different approximately abortion? The bible states (Psalm 139:sixteen) sixteen Your eyes observed even the embryo of me, And on your e book all its aspects have been down in writing, As regards the days while they have been formed And there grew to become into not yet one among them. And the bible additionally states (James 2:11) . . .For he who reported: “you mustn't devote adultery,” reported additionally: “you mustn't homicide.” If, now, you do not devote adultery yet you do homicide, you have grow to be a transgressor of regulation. . . God perspectives each and every soul as useful. the reason god helps Miscarriages is the same because of fact the reason ailment happens. examine the stated article below. he's stepping in to unfastened mankind from suffering. I asked for the article to be examine so as that i ought to save some area and supply you some thing to examine later. --Fluffy :: those miscarriages weren't a sin! Sin from adam and eve has made us imperfect the place we've each and all of the subject concerns that reason miscarriages. Jehovah is going to eliminate a majority of those plagues from mankind! You too could desire to examine the article below!

2016-11-04 00:08:42 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Thank you for supporting terrorists worldwide
on behalf of all Jihadists you are awarded the coveted Bleeding Poosy Liberal Douchebag Award
congratulations my friend

2006-08-06 05:01:27 · answer #4 · answered by hadji from des moines 3 · 0 0

I think you should be deported for being a dumbass..

Billy Clinton didn't think Bin Laden posed a threat in 1998. I think Bill was wrong.

2006-08-06 05:00:10 · answer #5 · answered by John 3 · 0 0

He did not allow it to happen, and there is no evidence of that, or you would ahve certainly documneted it here....or teh evidence you ahve has been blow out of the water so many times....you jsut can't stand telling us...like most Libs....

2006-08-06 05:09:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Clinton should, he was the one that let Osama bomb the center in 1993 and did nothing about it.

2006-08-06 05:10:27 · answer #7 · answered by Black Sabbath 6 · 0 0

no. we may all hate bush but no.
his problem he's letting being a president go to his head.

scary john kerry is a fairy.
please don't read that my friends with me i promised she could write something.(dumb me)

2006-08-06 05:03:12 · answer #8 · answered by Buffy Blood 1 · 0 0

Should Clinton?

2006-08-06 04:59:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He didn't allow it to happen.

Too bad we can't convict someone for stupidity.

2006-08-06 04:59:46 · answer #10 · answered by Albannach 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers