This is a good question... I think I might take but McGahee, but Westbrook should see the ball alot more this year with the Eagles loss of T.O. The Bills have QB problems and that could effect the running game negatively. Overall, I would go McGahee, but if you are a Westbrook fan or don't like McGahee, I don't see a problem in taking Westbrook
2006-08-06 06:45:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by n1ck34@sbcglobal.net 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm gonnna go BRIAN WESTBROOK. I know that might surprise some people but let me break it down a little bit. First, McGahee has the 2nd worst O-line (Arizona being the worst) in the NFL. Second the Bills have no offense, they dont have a set QB as of right now, and when they do decide it will be either JP Losman or Kelly Holcomb who both suck anyway, and that won't take any pressure off of McGahee. Westbrook on the other hand will get more carries than he's ever gotten in one season, and will catch his usual 70 catches and get about 700 yds receiving. He is the featured goalline back, plus Andy Reid did say he was gonna be more involved in the offense this year. I know most all publications have McGahee infront of Westbrook, but I like Westbrook for the reasons i just mentioned.
TAKE BRIAN WESTBROOK!!!
2006-08-06 05:01:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Taylor C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Westbrook is going higher basically because of the seasons they both had last year.
McGahee got worse as the season went on, while Westbrook was a pleasant surprise last year, for becoming more prolific in their offense.
Not only that, Buffalo is going to STINK this year, and while supporting cast is not always a good indicator, it sometimes is a great one, and when they have no QB, avg OL, and McGahee has a past with injuries, you can just see 8 men in the box all game long keying on their only offensive threat. Philly has enough going on that people won't be able to key on Westbrook exclusively.
Also, with TO out of the picture for good now, don't you know they tweaked the playbook in the offseason and added some more short passing back in their game?
McGahee has more raw talent, but he can't do it alone.
2006-08-06 05:19:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by You'll Never Outfox the Fox 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If I had to pick between McGahee and Westbrook, I think I'd have to take Westbrook. McGahee is in a new system in Buffalo and we don't know how he's going to respond to it while Westbrook has known Philly's offense for a few years now and he knows how Andy Reid functions offensively, so right now Westbrook is my choice.
2006-08-06 07:15:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Michael_D_Miller 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
properly, Westbrook continues to be out injured. Colston hasn't performed that lots presently. McGahee is ought to start a week RB, and Reggie Wayne is a ought to start WR. the reason you're 05 is because you do no longer understand something approximately soccer. Make that commerce, then turn on your consumer call and password and don't in any respect play delusion soccer lower back. you're an insult to the sport.
2016-10-01 13:10:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both backs have a lot of potential, but also serious downside. I've never been sold on Westbrook as a solid performer, so I'd go with McGhee. I don't think Philly has the offense to get ahead in games, and then hand the ball to Westbrook. But you can say the same about Buffalo.. Honestly, it's a toss up. Both of them are probably decent tier 2 or 3 RB's, but I wouldn't count on them as a #1 for your team.
2006-08-06 05:32:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by rychendroll 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Westbrook only if your league gives points for receptions. If not draft McGahee.
2006-08-06 13:20:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by aSfasgadgds 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mgahee. It won't take much to acquire Westbrook in a trade.
2006-08-09 14:48:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tucker C 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
mcgahee
2006-08-09 11:25:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
mcgahee no problem
2006-08-06 04:59:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by lex1979x 3
·
0⤊
0⤋