In three days the Japanese slaughtered 250,000 Chinese in the city of Nanjing in 1937. In Manchuria unit 731 released bubonic plague, anthrax, and other biological weapons on Chinese civilians all in an attempt to use biological weapons on American, British and Chinese armies. If you start a war be prepared to suffer the consequences if you lose it. Worry about today's wars and how we can stop them. Grow up and think about the consequences if Germany and Japan had won the war.
2006-08-06 04:27:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by BRY1970 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
How will they revenge death? Can they show America by bringing them back to life? Can killing more people make it OK? If Japan came to America, and killed 200,000 people to repay this, would America kindly say "Oh, OK. Here's your reciept, have a nice day."?
Fact is, there is no way to revenge a death. This is why the Middle East is a war-torn sewer line right now. We think we can revenge the deaths they have caused us, they think they can revenge the deaths we have caused them, and all it does is increase the number of deaths on both sides.
Japan does not try to get us back this way. Instead, they hit us with our own morality. Next time you watch an animated show that was made in Japan, count the number of mushroom clouds you see in it. There will always be exactly two, one for Hiroshima, and one for Nagasaki.
2006-08-06 04:24:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by ye_river_xiv 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
They already have. But instead of a military campaign, they went the route of an economic one. Japanese products are in every American home, and most people buy Japanese cars over America made. All this commerce has allowed Japan to take a leading role in the manufacturing industry and I'd call that a victory.
2006-08-06 04:15:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by trevor_brown 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There will be no end to foolish questions of this sort, because it appears there is no end of judges who pronounce their verdicts without hearing all the evidence, or by denying that some of the evidence exists. They seem also to have reached an irreversible opinion impervious to contrary thought, no matter how well researched and presented.
There is no reasonable answer to this question (assuming that the author meant to use the word "avenge" in place of "revenge"). Current events are always based on current environments. Justifying murder and mayhem on the grounds of avenging some perceived wrong done 60 or 3000 years ago is the product of a radical mind that has no valid economic purpose in committing violence against another person or group.
Japan thought to improve its economic circumstances by stealing the right to command the resources of the USA. The USA thought to preserve its economic resources by thwarting the Japanese military initiative. Instead of assuming the right to govern Japan as the victor in the war, we set about demonstrating how they could marshal their own resources to improve their state. I believe we succeeded in helping them far beyond their ability to accomplish this on their own.
Current events do not require that the Japanese engage in costly military enterprise to be better off. Those Japanese citizens who might think to justify war against the USA as a matter of vengeance will be cut off by those who are prospering in the peace between us: a huge majority.
2006-08-06 04:55:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by shawickman 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Right after China gets revenge for the millions of Chinese civilians that the Japanese killed from 1937 - 1945...
The death toll is an estimated 9 million...
2006-08-06 04:15:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some body tell those kids the Atom bomb came after Pearl Harbor.
But back to the Question,,,
Japan sells more cars,and appliances in this country than Americans do.
They have their revenge with our a shot being fired.
2006-08-06 04:24:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by sam s 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
the japanese understand that thier goverment at the time was much like our gw bush lead gop goverment of today. bent on power through war and did not care about thier own people and the result was well you know already. dont get me wrong we killed many more of these people than 200,000 from the a bomb drops. you need to recall the reason for the bomb. the man and goverment in charge of us at the time by best advice from all experts said 7,000,000 japanese would be killed in a direct attack by invasion from the allies. something like 2,000,000 allies would also die. do the math these people know we were trying to save human life thiers as well as ours. alot different than our gop gangesters of today. most are thankful it was just the smaller number and as i said us as well were thankful. good question. thanks.
2006-08-06 04:26:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd be hard pressed to have them take revenge because they were paid repremations to the effects of nuclear weaponds. Strangely, the government at that time realized it's mistakes and tried to fess up to it. In either case, with all of the technology comming in from Japan, I think that any revenge they could have made has been made in our pocketbooks.
2006-08-06 04:15:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Rob D 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't you mean "avenge"? I think the Japanese people are probably over a war that they started in the first place over 60 years ago. And don't worry, they spilled plenty of American blood.
2006-08-06 04:16:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by rlw 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
When the chinese get revenge for the death camps the Japanese ran in China and the sex slaves revolt against the Japanese. Fair enough?
2006-08-06 04:14:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋