Why does DUH-bya think a good Foreign Policy is sitting on ones hands?

Question

Is this guy the epitome of incompetence or what?

Answer 1

No, he is just repaying his debts to the weapons and oil companies that bankrolled his campaign so he can advertise and lie like crazy and get your vote

Answer 2

The cries from liberals (not the classic liberals but the modern type) are that the President is doing the wrong thing or doing too much. Now the cry is, he is setting on his hands.

I’ve never supported either of the Bush Presidents and I am concerned about some of the actions taken, but I like to think I deal with facts rather than erecting gossamer dreamscapes from whole cloth. Please provide support for your allegation of “sitting on his hands.”

Answer 3

particularly. This united states of america had a brilliant sort of sturdy will from countries and electorate in the middle East immediately after 9/11 which we've thoroughly squandered. Yeah, we crippled the Taliban, yet by ability of putting our troops in Iraq quite of leaving them in Afghanastan long sufficient to establish a robust government, we are going to finally end up with a robust government in neither. His approach in the direction of the United countries and not enlisting consensus in basic terms before the Iraqi blunder has made the USA the considered necessary concentration of worldwide terrorists quite of the will of the worldwide. His sturdy bonds with Saudi Arabian oil, no remember if or not they have been a rationalization for his movements in Iraq, have thoroughly undermined any ethical authority for something the US government is doing there. Others, fairly understandably have self assurance that we are there in basic terms for the oil. the thought we are bringing democracy to dangerously armed countries is ludicrous on its face, for the reason that at this factor all of us understand that the two Iran and North Korea are extra risky. the place we bombed with Iraq, we faucet dance with North Korea. ought to or not it is because of fact they even have WMDs?

Answer 4

He does so because he ordered Israel's current assault on Lebanon and Palestine in order to take the public pressure off of his administration and the endless list of problems they are facing. He is sitting on his hands because he needs this conflict to last long enough for people to forget about: numerous indictments of hi closest friends and advisors, failure in Iraq, unprecedented profits by oil companies (who the newest energy bill provides additional government subsidies to), NSA illegal wiretapping, the reclassification of some 10,000+ government documents that would have been publicly accessible in any other administration before, the reformation of the Taliban in Afghanistan, etc...etc...etc...

You get the picture, smoke and mirrors provided kindly by the U.S. little adopted brother, Israel.

Answer 5

I'm not a Bush fan but I don't think it is fair to say he is sitting on his hands. I mean we went into Iraq for no reason and has reeked havic on them and let's not forget that I think we are still at war with Afghanistan (although the news doesn't talk about it).

Answer 6

Sitting on ones hands? We just f'd the Taliban and are working on helping Iraqis.

Answer 7

you call what he has done for 5 years sitting on his hands? I bet Afghanistan and Iraq wish he had......You think that Indonesia thinks he sat on his hands? I bet they are glad that he didn't.......you really need to look closer at all the things he has done....research before you speak, and you will look more intelligent

Answer 8

You complain when he does something.

You complain when he doesn't.

Your just a noid. If you had a friend, the two of you would make a pair a noids.

Answer 9

Yes, incompetence.

He didn't even know what to do when his OWN country was under direct attack until someone told him.

Answer 10

comic relief
OK w jokes