English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

WMDs were found and under reported in the media. The so called lie about wmds being the reason for the war was supported and believed by the left and the reason for Clinton doing some bombing in iraq. so why do the DEMS backed by the media insist that Bush lied when the evidence is contrary ?

2006-08-06 03:44:28 · 11 answers · asked by W E J 4 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

11 answers

I agree. It seems that some media will continue to repeat the lie about there not being WMD until they get to film someone die from exposure.

There is a huge paper trail about the WMD. There are audio tapes of Saddam talking about them. This is a huge country, a lot of it empty and unpopulated and we still find large bunkers of hidden weapons. . .the size of several football fields.

Some in the democrat party don't care about the truth, they only think about how it might hurt the other party or help them.....

2006-08-06 04:37:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

the evidence of WMD found is untrue. The only WMD found were created before the first gulf war and were unusable today. Don't you think the Republican spin machine would be reporting the findings of WMD 24/7? Fox News would be glad to report it even if it was a lie. Bush himself joked at a fundraiser about how the WMD were not found. Bush said Iraq had WMD and they were a grave threat to America. He used post 911 fears to get the country all worked up. He claimed that Iraq could strike at any time and even put images of the mushroom cloud in people's heads. That's why weapons inspectors were in Iraq checking for weapons. But suddenly Bush pulled the inspectors out and said Sadaam had like 48 hours to leave Iraq. He wanted to start this war, and yes the ORIGINAL reason was WMD-which were never found. Please become more educated on this topic.

2006-08-06 03:53:57 · answer #2 · answered by erin h 1 · 0 0

Put your crack pipe down and read the article aging,,
No WMD where found in Iraq,
Yes,l Clinton bombed the no fly zoon in Iraq, and that is why Saddam Husein was no threat to any body,, It was a political war that shows the arrogant of republicans

2006-08-06 04:17:01 · answer #3 · answered by sam s 2 · 0 0

Bush let the Dems run with the WMD, and torture stories, playing on the reaction of Iran that the US is weak...This sounds sick as hell, but, HOORAY for the democrats...they are Bushs' secret weapon in winning the war against IRAN. IRAN hears, "WE can.t win, "Bush is incompitent", "Bush lied", "Cut and run".... IRAN thinks we can't hold it together now, so, they are coming out of the woodwork with Syria, Hezbollah, and Hamas, playing right into the hands of George W. Bush....Thanks again Dems, you are great Americans, and don't even realize it.


ERIN and SAM...If Clinton would have used the " ORAL " office for its true purposes we wouldn't be in this mess to start with...

2006-08-06 04:21:49 · answer #4 · answered by rochelle_hall2000 3 · 0 0

we are nearing the day as quickly as we can hit Iran . maximum folk understand that or a minimum of begrudgingly renowned that . yet what anybody is lacking is that we are going to additionally possibly hit Syria , possibly concurrently with Iran . Why ? nicely , different than for the obtrusive Syrian terrorist help , there is often been that nagging concern of that convoy of autos that left Iraq days till now the war . that comparable convoy that we tracked into the middle of the Bekka Valley . Out in the midst of nowhere and then by surprise surrounded and guarded by ability of Syria's #a million Brigade the place they stayed positioned for months . No why could any united states of america arbitrarily installation their #a million Brigade to the middle of nowhere for no obvious reason ? -- WMD's maybe ? nicely , specific , till any of you have a extra useful rationalization .

2016-11-04 00:04:58 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Don't you think that if WMD's were found, the Bush regime would have them laid out for the world to see? Rick Santorum's claim about them was totally debunked by the Pentagon the next day. What color is the sky on your Planet?

2006-08-06 03:48:35 · answer #6 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 0 0

When did Clinton bomb Iraq? He was too passive. The only WMD is Bush's mentality.

2006-08-06 03:49:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Does any still believe in WMDs?

Yahoo News says 1/2 of the USA still does right here...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060806/ap_on_re_us/iraq_believing_wmd_2

1/2 of us are morons.

2006-08-06 16:30:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because your stupid and didn't read the entire article.. Go back and try again moron!!

2006-08-06 03:48:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

they lied for so long they don't know how to speak the truth

2006-08-06 03:48:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers