2006-08-06 03:37:27 · 12 answers · asked by Buda B 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Don't worry ...bird flu or west Nile will fix that problem
2006-08-08 19:21:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes of course it would. Human population growth and the resulting demand for resources is the single most important issue of this century. The correct way to do it is to have worldwide negative population growth. If on a world wide basis 50% of this generation had no children and 50% of the next generation followed suit then by the end of this century you may have the problem under control
2006-08-06 11:03:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well that all depends are these mad crazed people trying to rule the world? then i say yes sure why not. But the world sure be a lonely place then.so what you thining to only leave white people / well just to let you know there is and never will be such a thing as a real pure white person. we all came from one part of the planet or another so. it wont work . and if there is such a thing they would only turn on echother becouse they would not have anyother race to pick on.
2006-08-06 10:48:38 · answer #3 · answered by mary_llinas 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IT would be a better world IF at least 3 billion people STOPPED BREEDING for 2 years!
2006-08-06 10:47:08 · answer #4 · answered by Samuella SilverSelene 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The world isn't about numbers. It doesn't matter how many people live on Earth!! The world would be a better place if only a coupla bad people died. *coughs* You know what I mean!
2006-08-06 10:46:14 · answer #5 · answered by Staccato 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no it would not. who says the 3 billion people disappeared be the bad one?
2006-08-06 10:41:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes. the planet Earth could be paradise were it not for us filthy, greedy, overly prolific humans. we humans had a certain wild charm when we were still in little tribal units but the industrial revolution turned us into a very nasty plague, a virus that is killing the vital organs that are Earth's Eco systems. like any fatal viral disease we'll die out when the host dies but tragically by that time we will have killed off most everything else free, breathing and beautiful.
2006-08-06 10:57:20 · answer #7 · answered by nebtet 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you volunteering to be one of them? If not, what would you suggest the criteria was for determining who went? Third world countries? Criminals only? Those who don't share your religion or your particular prejudices? Fast food workers? If so, how do you think the world would be better if you were no longer here?
2006-08-06 11:00:04 · answer #8 · answered by Crooks Gap 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think the world would be a better place after suffering such a fate. But look at the bird flu pandemic we're facing. And global warming. We're just killing ourselves.
2006-08-06 10:44:58 · answer #9 · answered by Simone 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is an absurd thought. No catastrophy presently known to mankind can remove half the mankind. It is better to think positive and plan for betterment of humanity. Also your head may need examination.
2006-08-06 10:41:41 · answer #10 · answered by HMG M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah if those 3 billion people were politicians.
2006-08-06 10:42:59 · answer #11 · answered by spiritwalker 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋