USA was pretty damn crappy.
but serbia and montenegro was pretty bad too...i mean, how does one lose 6-0????
2006-08-06 03:50:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lola P 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you mean the world cup, a lot of teams were very bad. Lets see there was an awfully under-par Brazil, Lucky boys Italy, Bad boys Portugal(lets also add Netherlands as there temper on field was no better than the Portuguese themselves), cry babies England, the incompetent Serbs, lackluster teams like USA Japan et al, et al. But if i were to pick just one I would without a doubt pick according to me the worst team of the wc- SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO. A 6-0 drubbing by Argentina. They are rookies all right and it is pretty marvelous for a country that doesn't have much Football history. But still after such a loss any team would at least try to do better. But instead they force a draw against a useless team. No wins In wc. They should have tried to use the opportunity they got but instead takes it for granted. And what happened to the team was the result
2006-08-06 12:30:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Im not a traitor to America, but we were pretty disappointing in the cup. We had one shot on goal in the first 2 games, and the only reason we had a shot to get out of the first round is because Italy scored an own goal.
2006-08-06 10:09:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mattman22 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Serbia and Montenegro. 0-3 and only 2 goals. The United States scored the only goal against Italy other then the final game and they lost to good teams. If the States could tie Italy they were pretty good. France should've won though.
2006-08-06 12:04:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by centreofclassicrock 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess after a very good showing in 02 the U.S. had some higher expectatioons and even having the same coach. I would describe this as a dissapointment but they did also play terrible (except for a decent game against the Italians under the circumstances)
2006-08-06 11:21:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kevin 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
worse ones or can we also include dirriest? I would say Italy for being one of the dirrest team, includ. Portugal, too. Being the dirrest is actually worse than playing bad. But whatever, Italy won the freaken cup, even though they didn't deserve it. So...it does matter.
2006-08-07 01:38:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by bitterswtlife 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh, man! Two of them, one is worse than the other! Worst: Team USA and second to worst: Poland. Am I right?
2006-08-06 10:15:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by The_Thinker 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Brazil, I mean their the number 1 team in the world and people expected so much, even if they didn't make it past the Quaterfinals they need to figure out a way to beat France.
2006-08-06 13:40:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tina G 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Costa Rica, Japan, USA, Serbia and Montirago
2006-08-06 11:11:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Varun 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
france,no team work & totally NO class.one good player does not make a good team.without zuzu they should be demotted to the minor leagues.
2006-08-06 15:27:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋