Why Are Left-Wing -Liberals So Enamored With Bill Clinton?

Question

One wonders why Liberals adore him when...Bill Clinton disgraced the Office of the Presidency in a rank, vulgar and unparalled manner, : Oral Sex, in the Oval Office, Perjury, A loooong history of sexual misconduct while in office ranging from groping, to accusations of rape, conducting adminstration policy by polls, a palpable disrespect and disregard for the military, NOW manuvering for a key position of the most corrupt, impotent,useless,failed,worthless institution
on the face of the Earth..the United Nations, a perfect match,
he built a Library to enshrine ... what? His illustrious legacy?

What would be considered shameful behavior, culiminated by his declaration to the world, "I did not have sex with 'that' woman" statement is considered to be what ... by the Left... something akin to a Winston Chuchill's declaration to bolster his countrymen, not to mention the nickname he bears as the "Wizard of 'Is'" yet the Left- just love him.

Answer 1

It's even more puzzling when you consider that Clinton signed welfare reform into law, which kicked thousands of people off the welfare rolls. He sees that as his major accomplishment in office.

He's also a millionaire.

He also engaged in a lie regarding the Balkan war. In fact, the whole world did. We were led to believe that the Serbs were like the German "Huns," raping and pillaging the weaker peoples. While they were brutal, it is also true that all the other ethnic groups were just as brutal. It was propaganda designed to whip up support for intervention. (See book, "The First Casualty," by Peter Knightsley.)

Clinton pretty much sucked. He was charismatic, and a good speaker, but he had relatively little of substance to say. His speeches, while impressive, are mostly hollow platitudes, bromides, and bumper sticker slogans. Yet his supporters ate it up. Curious indeed.

Love, Jack

Answer 2

Sorry conservatives, Bill Clinton was a great president. If you actually look at the numbers, the economy did splendidly under Bill Clinton, and employment was the best its been in a long time. He actually reduced the national deficit, and ended up with a budget surplus. Not only that, he bolstered the nation's credibility with the rest of the world.

Conservatives define "sin" as sex, drugs, and rock and roll, so in their book Billy is the most evil of the evil. But what about the corrupt business practices that most conservatives worship? Look at the sleazy dealings of the Bush family with the Saudis, or the scummy relationships that Cheney has with various corporations like Halliburton? I guess that such things aren't "sin" in the right wing playbook. In the conservative world, it's not a sin to prop up corrupt dictatorships as long as the dictator SOB is "our SOB", like Somoza, or the dirtbags in Equatorial Guinea, or the warlords in Somalia, or even the Bin Laden family (why where they allowed to quietly fly back to Saudi Arabia after 9/11?)

It sounds like you're fishing for agreement with your right wing chumpies. Tragically, there are plenty of them out there. Go back to your talk radio and oxycontin for satisfaction, and leave the reality based world to liberals who can actually make it work.

Answer 3

@ Adam S. Clinton did not go away a surplus, he left a projected surplus, this is different. The week that Clinton introduced the "surplus," I have been given a examine from the DOJ that bounced. We used to get our exams previous due each and all of the time, and persevered to get them previous due after Clinton's announcement, yet getting a paycheck from the government.that bounces is a few thing that i in basic terms can not fathom. to answer the question, no remember the way you do the mathematics, no remember if Clinton left a surplus (he did not) or a debt, no remember if Bush wracked up the full $10 trillion debt all by ability of his lonesome or not, there is not any thank you to disclaim the incontrovertible fact that we are in $sixteen trillion plus debt immediately. no remember if $10 trillion is all Bush's, or partly Bush's, as a remember of fact nevertheless that the different $6 trillion is Obama's. no remember what Obama says, no remember what graphs and charts he places up, turns them sideways, the different way up or backwards, no remember what his surrogates say, their obfuscation does not substitute the incontrovertible fact that that guy further $6 trillion to the national debt in 3 and a nil.5 years. Our credit status has been downgraded. two times. it is undesirable for somebody, and catastrophic for a rustic. It occurred on Obama's watch. He had loads of warning that it grew to become into coming, promptly from Moody's, and he did not something to end it. no remember how plenty debt Bush further, it grew to become into Obama's debt that have been given us downgraded.

Answer 4

Poor little neocons. Try as they may to make the C- student Dubya look good, attacking the Rhodes Scholar William J. Clinton is the best they can do.

And why are neocons so negatively *obsessed* with sex? They sound like tongue-clucking Puritans from 17th century America. Criticisims of Bill Clinton's private-life sexual conduct looks a heck of a lot like gossipy envy.

Answer 5

Let's see now.....when Clinton lied, nobody died. When G. Bush lied, 1000's died, and continue to do so daily. Under Clinton, we had a great economy. Under Bush, we have gone through a deep recession, and the economy gets worse by the day due to unbelieveable deficits he runs up daily...Bush has added more national debt that ALL other presidents added together..and this is a good president???? Get a life, open you ignorant eyes. So what if someone gets a BJ in the oval office...more power to them...Clinton got screwed by Monica. Everyone in America is getting screwed royally by Bush! I don't have to be liberal to see what is going on...and in fact, I am a conservative. But Bush is a horror story! IF you cannot see that, you are neither conservative nor liberal, you are simply blind.

Answer 6

To be honest, I'd rather have a "disgrace" like Bill Clinton. He didn't invade a country by lying to the American people. He's not responsible for the deaths of thousands of innocent civilians. He's not responsible for Flag draped coffins of American soldiers, just to serve his own vanity.

Give me a disgrace like that any day. I'd rather have a president "getting some" in the oval office, than sending in the marines to prove he's a man.

Answer 7

Clue phone: That was how many years ago? Bush is in office now and rather than sleeping with a woman, he's sleeping on the job and basically prostituting our children's future with National Debt.

I'll take a private indiscretion over Bush's global humiliation any day.

Answer 8

you know as well as i do that liberals are not able to see any flaw within themselves, but they will make up things about conservatives. they are not the party of the people that is for sure, if they were then we would not have to bend over backwards to make sure we don't offend any other cultures while our culture is vanishing. this country has a culture of it's own but we can not show it off because we might upset someone new to the country, well let them go to the country they came from then.

Answer 9

He did what all liberals want to do. He got a ******** in the White House. Just ask Ted Kennedy

Answer 10

Women adore the naughty man and Democrats love him for getting votes primarily from women. I personally think he will be found one of our worst presidents because of his handling of the economy and Osama Bin Laden.