2006-08-06 01:10:10 · 11 answers · asked by mickey j 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
well actually they are a militant faction of the CIA
think about a few facts if you will
1 who trained and funded Bin Ladens organisation
2 How come the CIA still uses a certain bank from the Saudi Bin Laden group(oficially owned by his brothers but it's his money)
to make large international transactions
3 on 9/11 all planes were immediatly grounded: all except one from Bin Ladens brother
4 In 2001 Bush promised to freeze all assets of Bin Laden. 5 years later most of these are still happily owned by Bin Laden and a lot of his money is sittin in us accounts.
5 We know that the CIA could have prevented 9/11 and still they chose to do nothing.
Now you go put 1 and 1 together.
2006-08-06 01:23:08 · answer #1 · answered by peter gunn 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So what about "Taliban" then? Or other "splinter networks"?
Definition of Al-Qaida:
"A terrorist network intensely opposed to the United States that dispenses money and logistical support and training to a wide variety of radical Islamic terrorist groups; has cells in more than 50 countries"
They don't sound like a "front" to me, though certain militaries may exploit there activities or lack thereof! :(
2006-08-06 01:23:17 · answer #2 · answered by Life after 45 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Too few, they accept the rubbish that the mainstream media perpetuates. If the USA was interested in capturing terrorists, why is Gitmo full of ordinary people who wouldn't know one end of a gun from the other?
2006-08-06 07:57:20 · answer #3 · answered by Paul B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Could well be. It seems likely that Afghanistan was invaded to bring about political stability so that an oil pipeline could be built to take oil from the Caspian Sea.
2006-08-06 01:18:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think its a general name given by the media to any form of arabic terrorism. I don't really think its as big as they make out.
2006-08-06 01:19:08 · answer #5 · answered by ordiofile 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely not. They are everywhere, even in peaceflul countries waiting to strike at the right moment.
2006-08-06 01:29:49 · answer #6 · answered by john j 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Isn't AL-Queda arabic for C.I.A???
2006-08-06 01:53:48 · answer #7 · answered by John Trent 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For what??
Am I right in thinking you are suggesting that the western governments are fighting themselves???
2006-08-06 01:15:32 · answer #8 · answered by izzieere 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's a red herring
2006-08-09 02:57:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i do....the world is so full of conspiracy...i believe these conspiracy theories
2006-08-06 01:56:28 · answer #10 · answered by ekcentrik 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋