It depends on several factors such as quality and length. A wav file with a high audio quality can be huge, while a better sounding MP3 of the same content would be smaller. AVI is not a sound file it is video.
2006-08-06 00:47:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bryan 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Almost invariably, MP3 is smaller than WAV, because MP3 compression throws away the information that is imperceptible by the human ear (a.k.a. perceptual encoding). A typical file size of a stereo MP3 file is about 1MB per minute of song, whereas the equivalent stereo WAV file at CD quality is around 10MB per minute.
AVI is actually a file format for a video/audio file, and good-quality video requires enormous file sizes.
2006-08-06 00:55:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by BryanIRL 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
mp3 is smaller while comparing to wav or avi
2006-08-06 00:47:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
mp3 is usally very much smaller than a wav for the same music/sound as it is compressed and wav isn't.
AVI is a video format.
2006-08-06 00:47:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Steve C 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think its mp3, I know it's not avi.
2006-08-06 00:49:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by GreyGHost29 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
smallest with best quality out of those 3 is mp3. but WMA is better again.
2006-08-06 00:46:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
mp3 format is the smallest
2006-08-06 00:47:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by wisecrack 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends.
2006-08-06 00:46:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by zoomjet 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
mp3
2006-08-06 00:48:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by pragjnesh_reddy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
mp3
2006-08-06 00:47:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by strange_raga 4
·
0⤊
0⤋