English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-06 00:43:00 · 11 answers · asked by can0nbal 1 in Entertainment & Music Music

11 answers

It depends on several factors such as quality and length. A wav file with a high audio quality can be huge, while a better sounding MP3 of the same content would be smaller. AVI is not a sound file it is video.

2006-08-06 00:47:49 · answer #1 · answered by Bryan 7 · 0 0

Almost invariably, MP3 is smaller than WAV, because MP3 compression throws away the information that is imperceptible by the human ear (a.k.a. perceptual encoding). A typical file size of a stereo MP3 file is about 1MB per minute of song, whereas the equivalent stereo WAV file at CD quality is around 10MB per minute.

AVI is actually a file format for a video/audio file, and good-quality video requires enormous file sizes.

2006-08-06 00:55:35 · answer #2 · answered by BryanIRL 2 · 0 0

mp3 is smaller while comparing to wav or avi

2006-08-06 00:47:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

mp3 is usally very much smaller than a wav for the same music/sound as it is compressed and wav isn't.

AVI is a video format.

2006-08-06 00:47:20 · answer #4 · answered by Steve C 4 · 0 0

I think its mp3, I know it's not avi.

2006-08-06 00:49:28 · answer #5 · answered by GreyGHost29 3 · 0 0

smallest with best quality out of those 3 is mp3. but WMA is better again.

2006-08-06 00:46:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

mp3 format is the smallest

2006-08-06 00:47:34 · answer #7 · answered by wisecrack 2 · 0 0

Depends.

2006-08-06 00:46:21 · answer #8 · answered by zoomjet 7 · 0 0

mp3

2006-08-06 00:48:25 · answer #9 · answered by pragjnesh_reddy 2 · 0 0

mp3

2006-08-06 00:47:06 · answer #10 · answered by strange_raga 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers