to what extent do you agree with this statement? "failure is proof that the desire wasn't strong enough

Answer 1

not necessarily true

Answer 2

It's mumbo jumbo. It is not always possible to succeed, and anything less than success may be considered failure. Desire has nothing to do with it.

If I run a marathon and desire to win with all my heart, but I can't run more than 100 meters without becoming winded, I will still fail.

Or, if Iam a guy, and I desire to give birth - it won't happen because I am not properly equipped.

It's the kind of BS motivational optimists come up with that doesn't reflect the reality of life.

Answer 3

Lots of people die from cancer every day. Does that mean their desire to live was not strong enough? As humans, we are limited in our individual ability to accomplish some things. The statement may be true in some cases, but not for all.

Answer 4

+
That is a false statement. Failure could be from unfortunate circumstances that really can not be attributed to the person who fails. If a person fails because of outside interferences, it is not failure, it is a set back. Most of the time, fate and luck play the biggest part in the failure scenario.

Answer 5

Not very. It is to vague.
Desire alone can do a lot, or have no effect at all.
It is not about how bad I desire something that makes it happen.
It is do I have the means to make soemthing happen.
And if I do not, then how do I begin.
I desire winning the lottery every day, But no matter just how badly I desire that it never happens.

Answer 6

prefer is plastic. that's formed, purely as dedication could be formed. a guy or woman who has stepped forward masterful self-awareness can shape and direct his prefer as he desires. a guy or woman who has did no longer strengthen self-awareness, would be actual motivated by using his human nature and longings, that are resembling those of hundreds of human beings. as a result, this 2d guy or woman's prefer can actual be formed by using the ruling elite (who artwork for advert businesses, government propaganda departments, company employers, media businesses, etc.). so as to (finally!) answer your question, failure could be evidence that the will wasn't sturdy adequate, yet on condition that we are speaking a pair of concern the place the guy had entire administration over what he exchange into doing AND his recommendations exchange into no longer motivated, in any way, shape or form by using yet another greater smart recommendations. because this needless to say does no longer describe maximum suitable circumstances, i could say that the greater precise fact is: "Failure is evidence that the guy did no longer have adequate self-awareness to be waiting to foretell, clarify, administration, shape and direct his prefer (or dedication)."

Answer 7

I don't agree with or like flat statements like that. Lack of convictional strength is arguably the MOST COMMON reason for failure, but it's not necessarily the case. If a man is about to shoot you and you try to get his gun but get shot, does that mean you didn't want to live? Sounds like football coach bull$hit to me.

Answer 8

Not at all. it sounds like something that some Type A football coach would say to junior high kids right before his face turned read and the angina set in.

Answer 9

Disagree. No matter how hard they tried, ancient alchemists couldn't turn other elements into gold. Some things just aren't meant to be. It is a good motivation, however, for someone doing something physical ie. sports, studying, etc.

Answer 10

I disagree. Outside factors can always play into any situation. The statement intimates complete control in any situation, and that is man's ultimate illusion.

Answer 11

I would disagree to a point. One has to desire to accomplish something to actually do just that. However one needs to actually work at accomplishing that goal diligently. And of course sometimes it is juts not possible to accomplish certain things.