English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-05 23:35:06 · 3 answers · asked by robert w 2 in Consumer Electronics Cameras

3 answers

Pretty much. They'll both reduce the brightness range of an image in the areas covered by the darker portion of the filter. The classic example is the bright snow scene in the foreground with darker mountains or whatever in the background. You don't say why you need to know, so I hope that helps. Try this link for a general explanation of graduated filters: http://www.geocities.com/COKINFILTERSYSTEM/graduated_filters.htm

2006-08-06 05:44:35 · answer #1 · answered by dbaldu 6 · 0 0

The photographer did use an ND subsequently, and this is risk-free to declare this isn't any longer graduated. The foreground continues to be underexposed and it does not be if a grad became into used. He used an ND to convey down the brightness of the sky, so it does not be over uncovered and washed out. He then offset the ND interior the foreground with the aid of utilising the fill flash. He would have truthfully used a polarizer subsequently, however the swan's feathers and face would have not regarded a similar. An ND filter out is likewise no longer a coloured piece of glass or it does not be stated as independent density filter out. ND filters look gray and shrink the quantity of light achieving the movie. they have no result on shade stability.

2016-09-28 23:14:22 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Hi, I recommand you to try google picasa.

picasa is a Google's photo software. It's what should've come with your camera.

It can Edit , organise and Share you picture and small video clips.

It's very easy to use and is free, just like Google

Download it free in here:

http://www.adcenter.net.cn/google-picasa/

Good Luck!

2006-08-06 21:06:23 · answer #3 · answered by picasa_better 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers